Observational studyMedicine2021
A physician survey of poststroke aphasia diagnosis and treatment in China: SPEECH study.
Observational study in Medicine, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices towards aphasia among healthcare workers in Anhui, China: a cross-sectional survey.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Which Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) instruments are currently used in Germany: a survey.BMC geriatrics · 2024Article
- Diagnosis and differential diagnosis flow diagram of Chinese post-stroke aphasia types and treatment of post-stroke aphasia.Aging medicine (Milton (N.S.W)) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
abstractThe current status of the diagnosis and management of poststroke aphasia (PSA) in China is unknown.To analyze the physicians' strategy and knowledge about the management of PSA in clinical practice and the needs for standardization of diagnosis and treatment.This survey was conducted in March-August 2019 at 32 tertiary hospitals in 16 provinces/municipalities in China. The attending physicians from the Neurology and Neuro-rehabilitation/Rehabilitation Departments were included. The online questionnaire inquired about patient information, physicians' diagnosis and treatment behavior for PSA, and physicians' understanding of PSA.A total of 236 physicians completed the survey. Regarding PSA assessment, 99.2% of the physicians reported using medical history and physical examination, 93.2% reported using neuroimaging, and 76.3% reported using dedicated scales. Most physicians used a combination of drug and non-drug treatment. Neuro-regenerators/cerebral activators and anti-dementia drugs were the most common pharmacotherapies; butylphthalide, edaravone, and memantine were most frequently prescribed. Six months poststroke was rendered as a spontaneous language recovery period, and a ≥6-month treatment for PSA was suggested by many physicians. The lack of standardized treatment regimen/clinical guidelines and the limited number of approved drugs for PSA were the primary challenges encountered by physicians during practice. The majority of the physicians agreed with the necessity of guidelines or consensus for the diagnosis and treatment of PSA.The knowledge gaps exist among physicians in China regarding the assessment and management of PSA. The improved awareness of the available guidelines/consensus could improve the performance of the physicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.