Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34087691›Full record

ArticleAnimal : an international journal of animal bioscience2021

Nutritional value of suckler beef from temperate pasture systems.

M R F Lee, G A McAuliffe, J K S Tweed, B A Griffith, S A Morgan, M J Rivero, P Harris, T Takahashi, L Cardenas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animal : an international journal of animal bioscience, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Protein quality as a complementary functional unit in life cycle assessment (LCA).The international journal of life cycle assessment · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Taking the steps toward sustainable livestock: our multidisciplinary global farm platform journey.Animal frontiers : the review magazine of animal agriculture · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

M R F LeeRothamsted Research, North Wyke, Okehampton, Devon EX20 2SB, UK; University of Bristol, Bristol Veterinary School, Langford, Somerset S40 5DU, UK. Electronic address: MRFLee@harper-adams.ac.uk.
G A McAuliffeRothamsted Research, North Wyke, Okehampton, Devon EX20 2SB, UK.
J K S TweedAberystwyth University, Institute of Biological, Environmental and Rural Science, Gogerddan, Aberystwyth, Ceredigion SY23 2EB, UK.
B A GriffithRothamsted Research, North Wyke, Okehampton, Devon EX20 2SB, UK.
S A MorganRothamsted Research, North Wyke, Okehampton, Devon EX20 2SB, UK.
M J RiveroRothamsted Research, North Wyke, Okehampton, Devon EX20 2SB, UK.
P HarrisRothamsted Research, North Wyke, Okehampton, Devon EX20 2SB, UK.
T TakahashiRothamsted Research, North Wyke, Okehampton, Devon EX20 2SB, UK; University of Bristol, Bristol Veterinary School, Langford, Somerset S40 5DU, UK.
L CardenasRothamsted Research, North Wyke, Okehampton, Devon EX20 2SB, UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/C/000I0320Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/C/000J0100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The role of beef in human diets has been questioned over the last few decades, due largely to its typically high mass-based carbon footprint. However, recent advancements in sustainability literature challenge this paradigm based on the new theory that climate impacts of food commodities should be measured relative to their overall nutritional value rather than their nominal mass. This shift has opened a new opportunity for the global beef industry, and especially for pasture-based systems that can avoid food-feed competition for land and other resources, as beef is a nutritionally dense food. Nonetheless, the sector's true capability to supply a wide range of nutrients for humans, consistently across multiple systems under multiple weather patterns, has not been well-documented. Using whole-system datasets from the North Wyke Farm Platform in the South West of England, we investigated the nutritional value of beef produced from the three most common pasture systems in temperate regions: permanent pasture (PP), grass and white clover (GWC) and a short-term monoculture grass ley (MG). Beef produced from these three pasture systems was analysed for key nutrients (fatty acids, minerals and vitamin E) over three production cycles (2015-2017) to determine potential differences between systems. Fatty acid, mineral and vitamin E profiles of the pasture and silage fed to each group were also assessed, with subtle differences between pastures reported. For beef, subtle differences were also observed between systems, with GWC having higher omega-6 polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) concentrations than PP and MG. However, the overall nutritional quality of beef was found to be largely comparable across all systems, suggesting that temperate pasture-based beef can be classified as a single commodity in future sustainability assessments, regardless of specific sward types. A 100 g serving of temperate pasture-based beef was found to be a high source (>20% recommended daily intake: RDI) of protein, monounsaturated fatty acids, saturated fatty acids, vitamins - B2, B3, B12 and minerals - Fe, P, Zn; a good source (10-19% RDI) of vitamin - B6 and mineral - K; and a complementary source (5-9% RDI) of omega-3 PUFA, vitamin - B9 and minerals - Cu, Mg, Se. The nutritional value of a food item should be used in defining its environmental cost (e.g. carbon footprint) to make fair comparisons across different food groups (e.g. protein sources). Here, we showed that pasture-based beef had a nutrient indexed carbon footprint of between 0.19 and 0.23 Kg CO2-eq/1% RDI of key nutrients.

Indexed as

DietMeatAnimal FeedAnimalsCattleEnglandFatty Acids, Omega-6Nutritive ValueFatty Acids, Omega-6Fatty acidsGrasslandNutritional qualityRed meatSustainability assessment

Identifiers

PMID34087691
PMCPMC8282502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.