ArticleBiomaterials2021
An ex vivo physiologic and hyperplastic vessel culture model to study intra-arterial stent therapies.
Article in Biomaterials, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- A vascular calcification model enabled by aniScience · 2026Article
- Therapeutic Target Mapping to Advance Drug Repurposing for Cardiovascular Disease: A Perspective from an Explanted Heart Biobank.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Intravascular delivery of an MK2 inhibitory peptide to prevent restenosis after angioplasty.Biomaterials · 2025Article
- Innovative Atherosclerosis Models: Advancing Pathophysiology and Translational Research.Research (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Review
- In-culture coronary stenting in anFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Synergistic coupling between 3D bioprinting and vascularization strategies.Biofabrication · 2023Review
- Bioprinting of 3D Adipose Tissue Models Using a GelMA-Bioink with Human Mature Adipocytes or Human Adipose-Derived Stem Cells.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- 3D Printed Bioreactor Enabling the Pulsatile Culture of Native and Angioplastied Large Arteries.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Conventional in vitro methods for biological evaluation of intra-arterial devices such as stents fail to accurately predict cytotoxicity and remodeling events. An ex vivo flow-tunable vascular bioreactor system (VesselBRx), comprising intra- and extra-luminal monitoring capabilities, addresses these limitations. VesselBRx mimics the in vivo physiological, hyperplastic, and cytocompatibility events of absorbable magnesium (Mg)-based stents in ex vivo stent-treated porcine and human coronary arteries, with in-situ and real-time monitoring of local stent degradation effects. Unlike conventional, static cell culture, the VesselBRx perfusion system eliminates unphysiologically high intracellular Mg
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.