Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34087309›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of biological macromolecules2021

A review of the tortuous path of nonviral gene delivery and recent progress.

Divya Sharma, Sanjay Arora, Jagdish Singh, Buddhadev Layek

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of biological macromolecules, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Optimization of CEST MRI Reporter Protein Design Using Cation-Pi Networks.Chemistry (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Unique DNA impacts on transient Expi293Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Divya SharmaDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, College of Health Professions, North Dakota State University, Fargo 58105, ND, USA.
Sanjay AroraDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, College of Health Professions, North Dakota State University, Fargo 58105, ND, USA.
Jagdish SinghDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, College of Health Professions, North Dakota State University, Fargo 58105, ND, USA.
Buddhadev LayekDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, College of Health Professions, North Dakota State University, Fargo 58105, ND, USA. Electronic address: buddhadev.layek@ndsu.edu.
North Dakota State University · US

Funding

Targeting CLEC-2/podoplanin as a therapeutic strategy for pancreatic cancerP20GM109024 · NIGMS · NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Sanku Mallik · 2016 to 2026
$20.5M
Brain Neurotropic Growth Factor Delivery to Prevent and Treat Alzheimer’s DiseaseR01AG051574 · NIA · NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI KANEKIYO, TAKAHISA, SINGH, JAGDISH · 2016 to 2020
$2.0M
Enhanced APOE2 Expression into Brain for Therapeutic Strategy for Alzheimer's DiseaseRF1AG068034 · NIA · NORTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI KANEKIYO, TAKAHISA, SINGH, JAGDISH · 2021 to 2022
$1.6M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG051574NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG068034NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM109024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gene therapy encompasses the transfer of exogenous genetic materials into the patient's target cells to treat or prevent diseases. Nevertheless, the transfer of genetic material into desired cells is challenging and often requires specialized tools or delivery systems. For the past 40 years, scientists are mainly pursuing various viruses as gene delivery vectors, and the overall progress has been slow and far from the expectation. As an alternative, nonviral vectors have gained substantial attention due to their several advantages, including superior safety profile, enhanced payload capacity, and stealth abilities. Since nonviral vectors encounter multiple extra- and intra-cellular barriers limiting the transfer of genetic payload into the target cell nucleus, we have discussed these barriers in detail for this review. A direct approach, utilizing physical methods like electroporation, sonoporation, gene gun, eliminate the requirement for a specific carrier for gene delivery. In contrast, chemical methods of gene transfer exploit natural or synthetic compounds as carriers to increase cellular targeting and gene therapy effectiveness. We have also emphasized the recent advancements aimed at enhancing the current nonviral approaches. Therefore, in this review, we have focused on discussing the current evolving state of nonviral gene delivery systems and their future perspectives.

Indexed as

Genetic TherapyGene Transfer TechniquesLipidsPolymersAnimalsHumansRNA, MessengerLipidsPolymersRNA, MessengerCationic lipidGene deliveryNonviral vector

Identifiers

PMID34087309
PMCPMC8266766
OpenAlexW3164524028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.