Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34086982›Full record

ArticleJournal of anatomy2021

Thickness accuracy of virtually designed patient-specific implants for large neurocranial defects.

Claudia Wittner, Markus Borowski, Lukas Pirl, Johann Kastner, Andreas Schrempf, Ute Schäfer, Klemens Trieb, Sascha Senck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of anatomy, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Claudia WittnerResearch Group Computed Tomography, University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria, Wels, Austria.
Markus BorowskiInstitut für Röntgendiagnostik und Nuklearmedizin, Städtisches Klinikum Braunschweig GmbH, Braunschweig, Germany.
Lukas PirlInstitut für Röntgendiagnostik und Nuklearmedizin, Städtisches Klinikum Braunschweig GmbH, Braunschweig, Germany.
Johann KastnerResearch Group Computed Tomography, University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria, Wels, Austria.
Andreas SchrempfResearch Group for Surgical Simulators Linz, University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria, Linz, Austria.
Ute SchäferForschungseinheit Experimentelle Neurotraumatologie, Medizinische Universität Graz, Graz, Austria.
Klemens TriebResearch Group Computed Tomography, University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria, Wels, Austria.
Sascha SenckResearch Group Computed Tomography, University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria, Wels, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-8400-5121

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The combination of computer-aided design (CAD) techniques based on computed tomography (CT) data to generate patient-specific implants is in use for decades. However, persisting disadvantages are complicated design procedures and rigid reconstruction protocols, for example, for tailored implants mimicking the patient-specific thickness distribution of missing cranial bone. In this study we used two different approaches, CAD- versus thin-plate spline (TPS)-based implants, to reconstruct extensive unilateral and bilateral cranial defects in three clinical cases. We used CT data of three complete human crania that were virtually damaged according to the missing regions in the clinical cases. In total, we carried out 132 virtual reconstructions and quantified accuracy from the original to the generated implant and deviations in the resulting implant thickness as root-mean-square error (RMSE). Reconstructions using TPS showed an RMSE of 0.08-0.18 mm in relation to geometric accuracy. CAD-based implants showed an RMSE of 0.50-1.25 mm. RMSE in relation to implant thickness was between 0.63 and 0.70 mm (TPS) while values for CAD-based implants were significantly higher (0.63-1.67 mm). While both approaches provide implants showing a high accuracy, the TPS-based approach additionally provides implants that accurately reproduce the patient-specific thickness distribution of the affected cranial region.

Indexed as

Prostheses and ImplantsSkullBone PlatesComputer-Aided DesignHumansTomography, X-Ray Computedcomputer-aided designcranial flapcraniofacial defectsimplant designthin-plate splines

Identifiers

PMID34086982
PMCPMC8450480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.