Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34086975›Full record

ArticleActa anaesthesiologica Scandinavica2021

COVID-19 versus influenza A/B supeRInfectionS in the IntenSive care unit (CRISIS): Protocol for a Danish nationwide cohort study.

Vibe S Mikkelsen, Marie Helleberg, Nicolai Haase, Morten H Møller, Anders Granholm, Merete Storgaard, Andreas B Jonsson, Kristian Schønning, Nanna Reiter, Sigurður Þór Sigurðsson and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Vibe S MikkelsenDepartment of Intensive Care, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9518-0566
Marie HellebergDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Nicolai HaaseDepartment of Intensive Care, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Morten H MøllerDepartment of Intensive Care, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anders GranholmDepartment of Intensive Care, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5799-7655
Merete StorgaardDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Andreas B JonssonDepartment of Intensive Care, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4611-5543
Kristian SchønningDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Nanna ReiterDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Sigurður Þór SigurðssonDepartment of Neurointensive Care and Neuroanesthesiology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Marianne VoldstedlundDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, Statens Serum Institut (SSI), Copenhagen, Denmark.
Steffen ChristensenDepartment of Clinical Medicine - Anaesthesiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.
Anders PernerDepartment of Intensive Care, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
University of Copenhagen · DKAarhus University Hospital · DKFrederiksberg Hospital · DKStatens Serum Institut · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSuperinfection following viral infection is a known complication, which may lead to longer hospitalisation and worse outcome. Empirical antibiotic therapy may prevent bacterial superinfections, but may also lead to overuse, adverse effects and development of resistant pathogens. Knowledge about the incidence of superinfections in intensive care unit (ICU) patients with severe Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) is limited.

methodsWe will conduct a nationwide cohort study comparing the incidence of superinfections in patients with severe COVID-19 admitted to the ICU compared with ICU patients with influenza A/B in Denmark. We will include approximately 1000 patients in each group from the time period of 1 October 2014 to 30 April 2019 and from 10 March 2020 to 1 March 2021 for patients with influenza and COVID-19, respectively. The primary outcome is any superinfection within 90 days of admission to the ICU. We will use logistic regression analysis comparing COVID-19 with influenza A/B after adjustment for relevant predefined confounders. Secondarily, we will use unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression analyses to assess six potential risk factors (sex, age, cancer [including haematological], immunosuppression and use of life support on day 1 in the ICU) for superinfections and compare outcomes in patients with COVID-19 with/without superinfections, and present descriptive data regarding the superinfections.

conclusionThis study will provide important knowledge about superinfections in ICU patients with severe COVID-19.

Indexed as

COVID-19Influenza, HumanSuperinfectionCohort StudiesDenmarkHumansIntensive Care UnitsSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID34086975
PMCPMC8212097
OpenAlexW3165300170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.