ArticlePloS one2021
Molecular imaging can identify the location to perform a frozen biopsy during intraoperative frozen section consultation.
Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Confounders of intraoperative frozen section pathology during glioma surgery.Neurosurgical review · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIntraoperative frozen section (FS) consultation is an important tool in surgical oncology that suffers from sampling error because the pathologist does not always know where to perform a biopsy of the surgical specimen. Intraoperative molecular imaging is a technology used in the OR to visualize lesions during surgery. We hypothesized that molecular imaging can address this pathology challenge in FS by visualizing the cancer cells in the specimen in the pathology suite. Here, we report the development and validation of a molecular-imaging capable cryostat called Smart-Cut.
methodsA molecular imaging capable cryostat prototype was developed and tested using a murine model. Tumors grown in mice were targeted with a NIR contrast agent, indocyanine green (ICG), via tail vein injection. Tumors and adjacent normal tissue samples were frozen sectioned with Smart-Cut. Fluorescent sections and non-fluorescent sections were prepared for H&E and fluorescent microscopy. Fluorescent signal was quantified by tumor-to-background ratio (TBR). NIR fluorescence was tested in one patient enrolled in a clinical trial.
resultsThe Smart-Cut prototype has a small footprint and fits well in the pathology suite. Fluorescence imaging with Smart-Cut identified cancerous tissue in the specimen in all 12 mice. No false positives or false negatives were seen, as confirmed by H&E. The mean TBR in Smart-Cut positive tissue sections was 6.8 (SD±3.8). In a clinical application in the pathology suite, NIR imaging identified two lesions in a pulmonary resection specimen, where traditional grossing only identified one.
conclusionMolecular imaging can be integrated into the pathology suite via the Smart-Cut device, and can detect cancer in frozen tissue sections using molecular imaging in a murine model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.