Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34086751›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2021

Effectiveness of attentional bias modification training as add-on to regular treatment in alcohol and cannabis use disorder: A multicenter randomized control trial.

Janika Heitmann, Madelon E van Hemel-Ruiter, Mark Huisman, Brian D Ostafin, Reinout W Wiers, Colin MacLeod, Laura DeFuentes-Merillas, Martine Fledderus, Wiebren Markus, Peter J de Jong

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07103785 (The Effectiveness of a Mobile Game Intervention in Modifying Attentional Bias Toward Alcohol Cues), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07103785 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Effectiveness of a Mobile Game Intervention in Modifying Attentional Bias Toward Alcohol Cues: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of YalovaRan2024 to 2025Enrolled60ConditionsAlcohol Use DisorderArmsMobile game app, Akamprosat or Naltrekson or combined medical treatment (Akamprosat and Naltrekson)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Janika HeitmannVerslavingszorg Noord Nederland, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-6307-3133
Madelon E van Hemel-RuiterBureau Gedragsstrategie, Assen, The Netherlands.
Mark HuismanDepartment of Sociology/ICS, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Brian D OstafinDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Experimental Psychopathology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Reinout W WiersAddiction Development and Psychopathology (ADAPT)-LAB, Department of Psychology, and Centre for Urban Mental Health, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Colin MacLeodSchool of Psychological Science, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Australia.
Laura DeFuentes-MerillasNovadic-Kentron, Network for Addiction Treatment Services, Vught, The Netherlands.
Martine FledderusStichting Philadelphia Zorg, Amersfoort, The Netherlands.
Wiebren MarkusIriszorg, Arnhem, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3857-0303
Peter J de JongDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Experimental Psychopathology, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3512-3663

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAttentional bias for substance-relevant cues has been found to contribute to the persistence of addiction. Attentional bias modification (ABM) interventions might, therefore, increase positive treatment outcome and reduce relapse rates. The current study investigated the effectiveness of a newly developed home-delivered, multi-session, internet-based ABM intervention, the Bouncing Image Training Task (BITT), as an add-on to treatment as usual (TAU).

methodsParticipants (N = 169), diagnosed with alcohol or cannabis use disorder, were randomly assigned to one of two conditions: the experimental ABM group (50%; TAU+ABM); or the control group (50%; split in two subgroups the TAU+placebo group and TAU-only group, 25% each). Participants completed baseline, post-test, and 6 and 12 months follow-up measures of substance use and craving allowing to assess long-term treatment success and relapse rates. In addition, attentional bias (both engagement and disengagement), as well as secondary physical and psychological complaints (depression, anxiety, and stress) were assessed.

resultsNo significant differences were found between conditions with regard to substance use, craving, relapse rates, attentional bias, or physical and psychological complaints.

conclusionsThe findings may reflect unsuccessful modification of attentional bias, the BITT not targeting the relevant process (engagement vs. disengagement bias), or may relate to the diverse treatment goals of the current sample (i.e., moderation or abstinence). The current findings provide no support for the efficacy of this ABM approach as an add-on to TAU in alcohol or cannabis use disorder. Future studies need to delineate the role of engagement and disengagement bias in the persistence of addiction, and the role of treatment goal in the effectiveness of ABM interventions.

Indexed as

Attentional BiasAdultAlcoholismFemaleHumansInternetMaleMarijuana AbuseMiddle AgedPsychotherapyTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID34086751
PMCPMC8177423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.