Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34086737›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

Health impacts of industrial mining on surrounding communities: Local perspectives from three sub-Saharan African countries.

Andrea Leuenberger, Mirko S Winkler, Olga Cambaco, Herminio Cossa, Fadhila Kihwele, Isaac Lyatuu, Hyacinthe R Zabré, Andrea Farnham, Eusebio Macete, Khátia Munguambe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. A complexity theory-informed COPC approach to evaluation of mining health programmes.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Implementation of Health Impact Assessment in the Healthcare System of the Republic of Kazakhstan.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Patient preferences and choices as a reflection of trust-A cluster analysis comparing postsurgical perceptions in a private and a public hospital.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  18. International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Andrea LeuenbergerSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-6116-148X
Mirko S WinklerSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
Olga CambacoManhiça Health Research Centre, Maputo, Mozambique.
Herminio CossaSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
Fadhila KihweleIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Isaac LyatuuSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
Hyacinthe R ZabréSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
Andrea FarnhamSwiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland.
Eusebio MaceteManhiça Health Research Centre, Maputo, Mozambique.
Khátia MunguambeManhiça Health Research Centre, Maputo, Mozambique.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Industrial mining projects can play an important role in global sustainable development if associated health risks are minimised and opportunities maximised. While a broad body of evidence from quantitative studies exists that establishes the interlinkages between mining operations and effects on public health, little research has been conducted investigating health impacts from the perspective of affected communities. This is particularly true in sub-Saharan Africa, where about a third of the remaining global mineral resources are endowed and health-related indicators for sustainable development are lagging behind. In this multi-country qualitative study, we explore community perceptions regarding impacts of industrial mining on their health and well-being. In nine study sites in Burkina Faso, Mozambique and Tanzania, we conducted 83 participatory focus group discussions with a total of 791 participants (385 men, 406 women). Our findings reveal a broad range of perceived impacts on environmental, economic and social determinants of health, with secondary health implications related to morbidity, mortality and well-being. Overall, perceived negative impacts prevailed, mainly related to environmental pollution, change in livelihoods or social disruption. Perceived positive impacts on health and well-being were related to interventions implemented by the mines such as new or improved water sources, health care facilities, roads and schools. The consistency of these findings across countries and study sites suggests a structural problem and indicates a pressing need to address health by acting on the wider determinants of health in mining regions. Participatory health impact assessment should be strengthened in host countries to foster strategic interventions, include marginalised population groups, and protect and promote the health of local communities. By including community perspectives on health before and during project implementation, policymakers can take advantage of economic opportunities while avoiding the pitfalls, bringing their communities closer to achieving good health and well-being goals by 2030 and beyond.

Indexed as

AttitudeAdultAfrica South of the SaharaAgedEnvironmental PollutionFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedMiningOccupational DiseasesOccupational Health

Identifiers

PMID34086737
PMCPMC8177516

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.