Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34086705›Full record

ArticlePloS one2021

New models for donor-recipient matching in lung transplantations.

J M Dueñas-Jurado, P A Gutiérrez, A Casado-Adam, F Santos-Luna, A Salvatierra-Velázquez, S Cárcel, C J C Robles-Arista, C Hervás-Martínez

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. A data-driven framework for fair and efficient organ transplantation using gradient boosting and adaptive genetic allocation.Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs · 2025
    Article
  4. Understanding Machine Learning Applications in Lung Transplantation: A Narrative Review.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Artificial Intelligence Advances in Transplant Pathology.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

J M Dueñas-JuradoIntensive Care Unit, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-2490-7531
P A GutiérrezDepartment of Computer Science and Numerical Analysis, Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain.
A Casado-AdamGeneral and Digestive Surgery Unit, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba, Spain.
F Santos-LunaPneumology and Lung Transplant Service, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba, Spain.
A Salvatierra-VelázquezThoracic Surgery and Lung Transplantation Service, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba, Spain.
S CárcelIntensive Care Unit, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba, Spain.ORCID 0000-0003-0548-4262
C J C Robles-AristaIntensive Care Unit, Reina Sofia University Hospital, Cordoba, Spain.
C Hervás-MartínezDepartment of Computer Science and Numerical Analysis, Universidad de Córdoba, Córdoba, Spain.
Hospital Universitario Reina Sofía · ESUniversity of Córdoba · ESInstituto Maimónides de Investigación Biomédica de Córdoba · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveOne of the main problems of lung transplantation is the shortage of organs as well as reduced survival rates. In the absence of an international standardized model for lung donor-recipient allocation, we set out to develop such a model based on the characteristics of past experiences with lung donors and recipients with the aim of improving the outcomes of the entire transplantation process.

methodsThis was a retrospective analysis of 404 lung transplants carried out at the Reina Sofía University Hospital (Córdoba, Spain) over 23 years. We analyzed various clinical variables obtained via our experience of clinical practice in the donation and transplantation process. These were used to create various classification models, including classical statistical methods and also incorporating newer machine-learning approaches.

resultsThe proposed model represents a powerful tool for donor-recipient matching, which in this current work, exceeded the capacity of classical statistical methods. The variables that predicted an increase in the probability of survival were: higher pre-transplant and post-transplant functional vital capacity (FVC), lower pre-transplant carbon dioxide (PCO2) pressure, lower donor mechanical ventilation, and shorter ischemia time. The variables that negatively influenced transplant survival were low forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) pre-transplant, lower arterial oxygen pressure (PaO2)/fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) ratio, bilobar transplant, elderly recipient and donor, donor-recipient graft disproportion requiring a surgical reduction (Tailor), type of combined transplant, need for cardiopulmonary bypass during the surgery, death of the donor due to head trauma, hospitalization status before surgery, and female and male recipient donor sex.

conclusionsThese results show the difficulty of the problem which required the introduction of other variables into the analysis. The combination of classical statistical methods and machine learning can support decision-making about the compatibility between donors and recipients. This helps to facilitate reliable prediction and to optimize the grafts for transplantation, thereby improving the transplanted patient survival rate.

Indexed as

FemaleGraft SurvivalHumansLung TransplantationMaleSpainSurvival RateTissue and Organ ProcurementTissue DonorsTransplant Recipients

Identifiers

PMID34086705
PMCPMC8177410
OpenAlexW3165475032

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.