Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34086481›Full record

Trial reportJCO global oncology2021

Response to Induction Neoadjuvant Hormonal Therapy Using Upfront 21-Gene Breast Recurrence Score Assay-Results From the SAFIA Phase III Trial.

Khalid AlSaleh, Heba Al Zahwahry, Adda Bounedjar, Mohammed Oukkal, Ahmed Saadeddine, Hassen Mahfouf, Kamel Bouzid, Assia Bensalem, Taha Filali, Hikmat Abdel-Razeq and 15 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JCO global oncology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 12 institutions in 9 countries.

Khalid AlSalehDepartment of Medicine, College of Medicine, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-5801-5745
Heba Al ZahwahryNational Cancer Institute (NCI), Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Adda BounedjarAnti Cancer Center, Blida, Algeria.
Mohammed OukkalMedical Oncology Department, Beni-Messous University Hospital, Algiers, Algeria.ORCID 0000-0002-4306-8377
Ahmed SaadeddineOncology Center, King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Hassen MahfoufMedical Oncology EPH, Rouiba, Algeria.
Kamel BouzidOncology Center of Pierre et Marie Curie, Algiers, Algeria.
Assia BensalemOncology Department, Dr Benbadis University Hospital, Constantine, Algeria.ORCID 0000-0002-1591-621X
Taha FilaliOncology Department, Constantine University Hospital, Constantine, Algeria.
Hikmat Abdel-RazeqKing Hussein Cancer Center (KHCC), Amman, Jordan.ORCID 0000-0003-2833-6051
Blaha LarbaouiOncology Center of Emir Abdelkader, Oran, Algeria.
Alaa KandilAlexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0001-7128-2971
Omalkhair AbulkhairSpecialized Medical Center (SMC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-7107-8743
Meteb Al FoheidiOncology Center of Princess Noorah, King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC), Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-8648-9836
Hassan ErrihaniMedical Oncology, National Institute of Oncology, Mohammed V University, Rabat, Morocco.
Marwan GhosnHematology-Oncology Department, Hotel Dieu de France, University Saint Joseph, Beirut, Lebanon.ORCID 0000-0003-1627-384X
Nashwa Abdel-AzizOncology Center, King Saud University Medical City (KSUMC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Maria ArafahDepartment of Pathology, King Saud University Medical City (KSUMC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-6847-5884
Hamouda BoussenFaculty of Medicine Tunis, University Tunis El Manar, Abderrahmen Mami Hospital, Ariana, Tunisia.
Farida DabouzInternational Cancer Research Group (ICRG), Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
Haleem RasoolKing Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Center (KFSHRC), Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-1329-5106
Mohun BahadoorInternational Cancer Research Group (ICRG), Sharjah, United Arab Emirates.
Jihen AyariFaculty of Medicine Tunis, Oncology Department, University Tunis El Manar, Military Hospital of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia.
Sharif KullabOncology Center, King Saud University Medical City (KSUMC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Jean-Marc Nabholtz
King Saud University · SAKing Saud Medical City · SAUniversity of Sharjah · AECairo University · EGKing Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre · SAKing Hussein Cancer Center · JOMilitary Hospital of Tunis · TNMohammed V University · MASaint Joseph University · LBTunis University · TNUniversity Frères Mentouri Constantine 1 · DZUniversity of Algiers Benyoucef Benkhedda · DZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeLuminal, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer represents the most common subtype of breast malignancies. Neoadjuvant strategies of operable breast cancer are mostly based on chemotherapy, whereas it is not completely understood which patients might benefit from neoadjuvant hormone therapy (NAHT). MATERIALS AND

methodsThe SAFIA trial is a prospective multicenter, international, double-blind, neoadjuvant phase III trial, using upfront 21-gene Oncotype DX Breast Recurrence Score assay (recurrence score [RS] < 31) to select operable luminal human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative patients, for induction hormonal therapy HT (fulvestrant 500 mg with or without goserelin) before randomly assigning responding patients to fulvestrant 500 mg (with or without goserelin) plus either palbociclib (cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor) or placebo. The objectives of this interim analysis were to assess the feasibility of upfront RS determination on core biopsies in the Middle-East and North Africa region and evaluate the efficacy of induction NAHT in patients with an RS < 31.

resultsAt the time of this interim analysis, 258 patients with relative risk were accrued, including 202 patients (RS < 31% to 78.3%) treated with induction NAHT and 182 patients evaluable so far for response. The feasibility of performing the Oncotype DX assays on core biopsy specimens was optimal in 96.4% of cases. Overall, 93.4% of patients showed hormone sensitivity and no difference in NAHT efficacy was noticed between RS 0-10, 11-25, and 26-30. Interestingly, patients with high RS (26-30) showed a trend toward a higher major response rate (

conclusionThe upfront 21-gene assay performed on biopsies is feasible in our population and has allowed us to select patients with high hormone sensitivity (RS < 31). This approach could be an alternative to upfront surgery without significant risk of progression, particularly during pandemic times.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsNeoadjuvant TherapyAfrica, NorthernErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansMiddle EastNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProspective StudiesReceptors, EstrogenErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesReceptors, Estrogen

Identifiers

PMID34086481
PMCPMC8457874
OpenAlexW3164309011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.