Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34086424›Full record

ArticleCancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.)2022

The rate of estrogen receptor-conversion associated with tumor progression in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients following adjuvant Tamoxifen administration.

Sirus Djahansouzi, Bettina Hanstein, Daniel Rein, Michel Clees, Werner Rath

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Hybrid [AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Effect of adjuvant endocrine therapy: single-agentReports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Sirus DjahansouziCentre Hospitalier Emile Mayrisch, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Rue Emile Mayrisch, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.ORCID 0000-0002-5550-9141
Bettina HansteinDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University Hospital Cologne, Köln, Germany.
Daniel ReinDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Michel CleesCentre Hospitalier Emile Mayrisch, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Rue Emile Mayrisch, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.
Werner RathDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany.
Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg · LUDüsseldorf University Hospital · DEUniversitätsklinikum Aachen · DEUniversity Hospital Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHormone Receptor (HR)-discordance between primary breast cancer and metastasis is a known biological phenomenon. Discordance studies usually comprise a heterogeneous group of HR-positive and negative patients and allow for the comparison of changes in HR-status from the primary to the recurrent disease. However, in a clinical setting, the rate of estrogen receptor-conversion following endocrine therapy with agents such as Tamoxifen (TAM) in estrogen receptor-positive cancers is of primary interest as opposed to total receptor discordance.

aimTo investigate the rate of estrogen receptor-conversion associated with tumor progression in estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients following adjuvant TAM administration and to compare the results with the meta-analysis data of HR-discordance studies. METHODS AND

resultsA retrospective double-center review of biomarkers in 67 estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer patients who underwent TAM treatment in the adjuvant setting. The estrogen and progesterone receptor-status were compared at the time of diagnosis and following relapse and the Disease-free Survival, mean duration of TAM treatment as well as the operative, radiation, and cytotoxic therapies registered before TAM treatment, were recorded. Initially, all patients were estrogen receptor-positive. The average age at the time of diagnosis was 52.8 ± 12.4 years. After recurrence, only 47 patients (70.1%) were still estrogen receptor-positive with a highly significant loss of estrogen receptor-expression in 29.9% of cases. The mean duration of TAM treatment was 40.7 ± 19.9 months. 45 patients (i.e., 67.2%) progressed during the TAM treatment and the remaining 22 patients (32.8%) developed relapse after the TAM treatment had finished. Initially, there were 82.1% progesterone receptor-positive and 17.9% progesterone receptor-negative, but after relapse the progesterone receptor-positive cases diminished significantly to 53.7%, showing a progesterone receptor-loss of 28.4%.

conclusionThe rate of estrogen receptor-loss associated with tumor progression following TAM treatment is approximately 30%, which is of clinical relevance in order to evaluate further endocrine efficacy in these patients. This rate of receptor conversion is roughly 6-13% higher compared to the recently published meta-analysis data of discordance studies. This discrepancy could possibly be due to anti-hormonal therapy with TAM accentuating receptor conversion.

Indexed as

AdultBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsChemotherapy, AdjuvantDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleGene ExpressionHumansMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalRetrospective StudiesSelective Estrogen Receptor ModulatorsTamoxifenBiomarkers, TumorSelective Estrogen Receptor ModulatorsTamoxifenbiomarkersbreast cancerestrogen receptorprogesterone receptorreceptor conversionTamoxifen

Identifiers

PMID34086424
PMCPMC8789621
OpenAlexW3165089835

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.