Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34086273›Full record

ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2021

RNA Modeling with the Computational Energy Landscape Framework.

Konstantin Röder, Samuela Pasquali

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Konstantin RöderYusuf Hamied Department of Chemistry, University of Chemistry, Cambridge, UK. kr366@cam.ac.uk.
Samuela PasqualiLaboratoire CiTCoM, CNRS UMR 8038, Université de Paris, Paris, France. samuela.pasquali@parisdescartes.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recent advances in computational abilities, such as the enormous speed-ups provided by GPU computing, allow for large scale computational studies of RNA molecules at an atomic level of detail. As RNA molecules are known to adopt multiple conformations with comparable energies, but different two-dimensional structures, all-atom models are necessary to better describe the structural ensembles for RNA molecules. This point is important because different conformations can exhibit different functions, and their regulation or mis-regulation is linked to a number of diseases. Problematically, the energy barriers between different conformational ensembles are high, resulting in long time scales for interensemble transitions. The computational potential energy landscape framework was designed to overcome this problem of broken ergodicity by use of geometry optimization. Here, we describe the algorithms used in the energy landscape explorations with the OPTIM and PATHSAMPLE programs, and how they are used in biomolecular simulations. We present a recent case study of the 5'-hairpin of RNA 7SK to illustrate how the method can be applied to interpret experimental results, and to obtain a detailed description of molecular properties.

Indexed as

Nucleic Acid ConformationThermodynamicsAlgorithmsComputational BiologyComputer SimulationHumansModels, MolecularRNARNA, Long Noncodinglong non-coding RNA 7SK, humanRNARNA, Long NoncodingAlternative RNA structuresEnergy landscapePath sampling

Identifiers

PMID34086273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.