Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34086149›Full record

ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2021

Embryo quality, ploidy, and transfer outcomes in male versus female blastocysts.

Christopher P Moutos, William G Kearns, Sarah E Farmer, Jon P Richards, Antonio F Saad, John R Crochet

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. The Effect of Assisted Reproductive Technologies on Human Sex Ratios.The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Christopher P MoutosDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, 301 University Boulevard, Galveston, TX, 77555, USA. cpmoutos@utmb.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6816-658X
William G KearnsAdvaGenix, 9430 Key West Ave. Suite 130, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA.
Sarah E FarmerCenter of Reproductive Medicine, 7400 Fannin St. #1180, Houston, TX, 77054, USA.
Jon P RichardsCenter of Reproductive Medicine, 7400 Fannin St. #1180, Houston, TX, 77054, USA.
Antonio F SaadDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, 301 University Boulevard, Galveston, TX, 77555, USA.
John R CrochetDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynecology, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, 301 University Boulevard, Galveston, TX, 77555, USA.
The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · USJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe goal is to determine if variations exist between male and female blastocysts in preimplantation measurements of quality and ploidy and in vitro fertilization elective single-embryo transfer (eSET) outcomes.

methodsA retrospective chart review was conducted from a private fertility center's database of blastocysts undergoing preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy, along with details of eSET from this screened cohort. Main outcomes included preimplantation embryo quality and sex-specific eSET outcomes.

resultsA total of 3708 embryos from 578 women were evaluated, with 45.9% male and 54.1% female. The majority were High grade. No difference existed between embryo sex and overall morphological grade, inner cell mass or trophectoderm grade, or blastocyst transformation day. Female blastocysts had a higher aneuploidy rate than male blastocysts (P < 0.001). Five hundred thirty-nine eSETs from 392 women were evaluated, with High grade embryos more likely to have implantation (P < 0.001), clinical pregnancy (P < 0.001), and ongoing pregnancy (P = 0.018) than Mid or Low grade embryos. Day 5 blastocysts were more likely to have implantation (P = 0.018), clinical pregnancy (P = 0.005), and ongoing pregnancy (P = 0.018) than day 6 blastocysts. Male and female embryos had similar transfer outcomes, although female day 5 blastocysts were more likely to result in clinical pregnancy (P = 0.012), but not ongoing pregnancy, than female day 6 blastocysts. Male eSET outcomes did not differ by blastocyst transformation day.

conclusionMale and female embryos have comparable grade and quality; however, female embryos were more likely to be aneuploid. Ongoing pregnancy rates did not differ by embryo sex. Day 5 embryos had more favorable transfer outcomes than day 6 embryos.

Indexed as

Embryo TransferPloidiesAdultBlastocystEmbryo, MammalianFemaleFertilization in VitroGenetic TestingHumansMalePregnancyPregnancy RatePreimplantation DiagnosisRetrospective StudiesAneuploidyBlastocyst sexEmbryo sexPreimplantation genetic testing

Identifiers

PMID34086149
PMCPMC8490581
OpenAlexW3165658115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.