Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34086095›Full record

ArticleKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2022

Meniscectomy is still a frequent orthopedic procedure: a pending need for education on the meniscus treatment possibilities.

Paweł Bąkowski, Kamilla Bąkowska-Żywicka, Kinga Ciemniewska-Gorzela, Tomasz Piontek

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Three-dimensional-printed shape-memory composite scaffold for meniscus repair.The Journal of international medical research · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Evaluation of Porous (Poly(lactide-Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Paweł BąkowskiDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Rehasport Clinic, Górecka Street 30, 60-201, Poznan, Poland. pawel.bakowski@rehasport.pl.
Kamilla Bąkowska-ŻywickaInstitute of Bioorganic Chemistry Polish Academy of Sciences, Noskowskiego 12/14, 61-704, Poznan, Poland. kamilla.bakowska-zywicka@rehasport.pl.
Kinga Ciemniewska-GorzelaDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Rehasport Clinic, Górecka Street 30, 60-201, Poznan, Poland.
Tomasz PiontekDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Rehasport Clinic, Górecka Street 30, 60-201, Poznan, Poland.
Rehasport Clinic · PLInstitute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Polish Academy of Sciences · PLPoznan University of Medical Sciences · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the current status of education of polish surgeons in the subject of meniscus repair possibilities. The analysis of the possible correlations between the number of knee arthroscopy procedures performed by polish surgeons and their decision whether to remove or to repair the damaged meniscus has been performed.

methodsTwo-hundred and five registered orthopedic surgeons took part in surveys. The questionnaire contained the description of 20 patients with different types of meniscus damage and three questions concerning the experience in knee arthroscopy (two questions) and a choice of the treatment method (one question). Comparisons were made between knee arthroscopy experts (> 100 arthroscopies performed per year) and non-experts (≤ 100 cases).

resultsThe questionnaire was completed by 194 knee surgeons from Poland with different levels in knee arthroscopy experience. For most cases, experts and non-experts agreed on the meniscus treatment method. Statistically significant differences in the recommended treatment between experts and non-experts were observed in 4 cases, where experts decided to repair the damage rather than to perform the meniscectomy.

conclusionsMeniscectomy remains a frequent orthopedic procedure, despite meniscal sparing having been advocated for several decades now and despite the existence of meniscus repair technique which gives good clinical outcomes-augmentation of the damaged meniscus with a collagen membrane. Polish surgeons still need education on the meniscus treatment possibilities. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: V.

Indexed as

MeniscusTibial Meniscus InjuriesArthroscopyHumansMeniscectomyMenisci, TibialKnee arthroscopyMeniscus repairSurgical expertiseSurvey

Identifiers

PMID34086095
PMCPMC9007761
OpenAlexW3163962564

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.