ArticleDer Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft2022
[Reasons and risk factors for recurrent retinal detachment after removal of silicon oil in various vitreoretinal diseases].
Article in Der Ophthalmologe : Zeitschrift der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Retinal redetachment after silicone oil removal: a risk factor analysis.BMC ophthalmology · 2024Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPars plana vitrectomy (ppV) combined with silicone oil tamponade is a standard technique in the treatment of complicated retinal detachment. There are still recurrent cases of retinal detachment after silicone oil removal or redetachment with in situ oil tamponade.
objectiveThe aim was to identify possible risk factors for retinal redetachment and to use the knowledge for optimizing treatment.
methodsAnalysis of data from patients who were treated with ppV and silicone oil tamponade in the University Department of Ophthalmology in Marburg during 2010-2015 and who had a retinal redetachment during this period. The results were divided into two groups, redetachment with oil in situ and redetachment after oil removal.
resultsA total of 43 cases (15.6%) had a redetachment, which included 22/43 cases (50%) with a redetachment after oil removal and 21/43 cases (50%) with redetachment with oil in situ. The cause for the renewed detachment was given as proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) in 90.6% (39/43) of the cases, new foramina in 20.9% (9/43) and persisting foramina in 25.5% (11/43).
conclusionVitreoretinal scar formation (PVR reaction) was the main risk factor for renewed retinal detachment. Persisting foramina were also named as a frequent cause. Recurrent retinal detachment represents a significant challenge for vitreoretinal surgeons and for the patients considering the economic and emotional burden due to multiple interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.