ArticleESC heart failure2021
Machine learning algorithms for claims data-based prediction of in-hospital mortality in patients with heart failure.
Article in ESC heart failure, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A systematic review of machine learning algorithms for mortality risk, readmission and phenotype prediction in patients with heart failure: exploring key data sources, input variables and outcomes.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Pooled it
- Risk prediction model for peripherally inserted central catheters related bloodstream infection: a systematic review.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Pooled it
- Evaluation of machine learning methods for prediction of heart failure mortality and readmission: meta-analysis.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2025Pooled it
- Predictive Value of Machine Learning for the Risk of In-Hospital Death in Patients With Heart Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Clinical cardiology · 2025Pooled it
- Machine Learning Prediction of Heart Failure Readmissions: Insights From a Multicenter Emergency Department Trial.JACC. Advances · 2026Article
- Development and Validation of a Claims-Based Model to Predict Categories of Obesity.American journal of epidemiology · 2024Article
- Machine learning based readmission and mortality prediction in heart failure patients.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Predicting heart failure in-hospital mortality by integrating longitudinal and category data in electronic health records.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2023Observational
- Machine Learning for Mortality Prediction in Patients With Heart Failure With Mildly Reduced Ejection Fraction.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023Article
- Heart failure: an update from the last years and a look at the near future.ESC heart failure · 2022Review
- Machine learning-derived prediction of in-hospital mortality in patients with severe acute respiratory infection: analysis of claims data from the German-wide Helios hospital network.Respiratory research · 2022Article
- From population- to patient-based prediction of in-hospital mortality in heart failure using machine learning.European heart journal. Digital health · 2022Article
- Expected and observed in-hospital mortality in heart failure patients before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: Introduction of the machine learning-based standardized mortality ratio at Helios hospitals.Clinical cardiology · 2022Article
- Machine learning algorithms for claims data-based prediction of in-hospital mortality in patients with heart failure.ESC heart failure · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsModels predicting mortality in heart failure (HF) patients are often limited with regard to performance and applicability. The aim of this study was to develop a reliable algorithm to compute expected in-hospital mortality rates in HF cohorts on a population level based on administrative data comparing regression analysis with different machine learning (ML) models. METHODS AND
resultsInpatient cases with primary International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-10) encoded discharge diagnosis of HF non-electively admitted to 86 German Helios hospitals between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2018 were identified. The dataset was randomly split 75%/25% for model development and testing. Highly unbalanced variables were removed. Four ML algorithms were applied, and all algorithms were tuned using a grid search with multiple repetitions. Model performance was evaluated by computing receiver operating characteristic areas under the curve. In total, 59 125 cases (69.8% aged 75 years or older, 51.9% female) were investigated, and in-hospital mortality was 6.20%. Areas under the curve of all ML algorithms outperformed regression analysis in the testing dataset with values of 0.829 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.814-0.843] for logistic regression, 0.875 (95% CI 0.863-0.886) for random forest, 0.882 (95% CI 0.871-0.893) for gradient boosting machine, 0.866 (95% CI 0.854-0.878) for single-layer neural networks, and 0.882 (95% CI 0.872-0.893) for extreme gradient boosting. Brier scores demonstrated a good calibration especially of the latter three models.
conclusionsWe introduced reliable models to calculate expected in-hospital mortality based only on administrative routine data using ML algorithms. A broad application could supplement quality measurement programs and therefore improve future HF patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.