Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34085621›Full record

ArticlePublic health nutrition2021

Evaluating the implementation and customer acceptability of a sugar-sweetened beverage reduction initiative in thirty Australian aquatic and recreation centres.

Tara Boelsen-Robinson, Alethea Jerebine, Ariana Kurzeme, Beth Gilham, Oliver T Huse, Miranda R Blake, Kathryn Backholer, Alexandra Chung, Anna Peeters

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Public health nutrition, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Healthy Food Service Guidelines for Worksites and Institutions: A Scoping Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  2. Changes in Local Government Priorities and Stakeholder Satisfaction Following a Healthy Drinks Capacity-Building Intervention in Sports and Recreation Facilities in Victoria, Australia.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tara Boelsen-RobinsonSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1671-3091
Alethea JerebineYMCA Victoria, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1396-244X
Ariana KurzemeYMCA Victoria, Melbourne, Australia.
Beth GilhamDeakin University, Geelong, Global Obesity Centre, Institute for Health Transformation, Geelong, VIC3220, Australia.
Oliver T HuseDeakin University, Geelong, Global Obesity Centre, Institute for Health Transformation, Geelong, VIC3220, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9366-8012
Miranda R BlakeDeakin University, Geelong, Global Obesity Centre, Institute for Health Transformation, Geelong, VIC3220, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0649-2320
Kathryn BackholerDeakin University, Geelong, Global Obesity Centre, Institute for Health Transformation, Geelong, VIC3220, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3323-575X
Alexandra ChungSchool of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7121-9534
Anna PeetersDeakin University, Geelong, Global Obesity Centre, Institute for Health Transformation, Geelong, VIC3220, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4340-9132

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the feasibility of implementation and customer perspectives of a sugar-sweetened beverage (SSB) reduction initiative across YMCA Victoria aquatic and recreation centres.

designTwo data sources were used to assess implementation and customer acceptability. Photo audits were used to assess the type of drinks available for purchase 6 months prior to initiative implementation and 6 months after, in thirty centres. Change in the range of SSB targeted for removal, non-targeted SSB, as well as drinks classified as 'red' (limit), 'amber' (choose carefully) and 'green' (best choice), was reported. Customer surveys were conducted in three centres to assess acceptability and awareness of the initiative. Inductive and deductive thematic analysis was used to analyse customers' perspectives of the initiative.

setting30 aquatic and recreation centres in Victoria, Australia.

participants806 customers.

resultsAt post-implementation, 87 % of centres had removed targeted SSB. 'Red' drinks reduced by an average of 4·4 drink varieties compared to pre-implementation (11·9 varieties) and 'green' drinks increased by 1·4 varieties (3·2 varieties pre-implementation). Customers were largely unaware of the SSB-reduction initiative (90 %) but supported YMCA Victoria in continuing the initiative (89 %), with many believing it would support children in making healthier choices.

conclusionsImplementation of an initiative that limited SSB availability across a large number of aquatic and recreation centres was feasible and considered acceptable by customers. Customers frequently mentioned the importance of protecting children from consuming SSB.

Indexed as

Sugar-Sweetened BeveragesBeveragesChildConsumer BehaviorHumansRecreationVictoriaDrinkHealthy foodPolicyProcess evaluationSports and recreationSugar-sweetened beverage

Identifiers

PMID34085621
PMCPMC11082803

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.