Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34085112›Full record

SynthesisEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2022

High-volume center analysis and systematic review of stump appendicitis: solving the pending issue.

María A Casas, Nicolás H Dreifuss, Francisco Schlottmann

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05637554 (Laparoscopic Clipping Versus Extracorporeal Ligation in Complicated Appendicitis Upper Egypt Overview, Prospective Randomized Comparative Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05637554 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Laparoscopic Clipping Versus Extracorporeal Ligation in Complicated Appendicitis Upper Egypt Overview, Prospective Randomized Comparative Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorAssiut UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled40ConditionsAppendicitisArmsLaparoscopic appendectomy using clipping., Laparoscopic appendectomy using extracorporeal ligation to secure the base of the appendix.
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Stump appendicitis.Radiology case reports · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

María A CasasDepartment of Surgery, Hospital Alemán of Buenos Aires, Av. Pueyrredon 1640, C1118AAT, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1043-3865
Nicolás H DreifussDepartment of Surgery, Hospital Alemán of Buenos Aires, Av. Pueyrredon 1640, C1118AAT, Buenos Aires, Argentina.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8411-1960
Francisco SchlottmannDepartment of Surgery, Hospital Alemán of Buenos Aires, Av. Pueyrredon 1640, C1118AAT, Buenos Aires, Argentina. fschlottmann@hospitalaleman.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3565-0559
Hospital Alemán · AR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeStump appendicitis (SA) is a rare long-term complication after laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) that can be associated with high morbidity due to delayed diagnosis. We aimed to determine the incidence, risk factors, diagnosis, and management of SA by reviewing our large cohort of LA and performing a systematic review of the literature.

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed data of all patients who developed SA after LA between 2006 and 2020. Demographics, peri-operative variables, and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. A systematic review of the PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase and GoogleScholar bibliographic databases was also performed to identify publications regarding SA following LA.

resultsA total of 2,019 patients underwent LA; 5 (0.25%) developed SA after a median of 292 days. The most common symptom at presentation was right lower quadrant pain. Four SA (80%) occurred in patients with a history of complicated appendicitis at index operation. All patients were diagnosed with computed tomography and underwent completion stump appendectomy by laparoscopy. No postoperative complications were recorded. A total of 55 studies with 76 cases of SA after LA were identified in the systematic review. Most SA (98.7%) underwent surgery: 52% by laparoscopic approach and 36% through an open approach. Stump appendectomy was performed in 94.4% cases and an extended resection in 5.6%.

conclusionAlthough SA is a rare complication after LA, a high index of clinical suspicious and imaging studies are key for early diagnosis and treatment. A laparoscopic resection of the inflamed appendiceal stump is feasible, safe, and highly effective. A minority of patients with severe cecum compromise may need extended resections or conversion to open surgery.

Indexed as

AppendicitisLaparoscopyAppendectomyHumansPostoperative ComplicationsRetrospective StudiesAcute appendicitisLaparoscopic appendectomyLaparoscopyStump appendicitis

Identifiers

PMID34085112
OpenAlexW3164756335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.