ReviewAesthetic plastic surgery2021
Nanofat Cell-Mediated Anti-Aging Therapy: Evidence-Based Analysis of Efficacy and an Update of Stem Cell Facelift.
Review in Aesthetic plastic surgery, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Low-energy Morpheus8 and Nanofat Grafting for Compartment-specific Facial Rejuvenation: Selective Fat Remodeling and Skin Quality Enhancement.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2025Article
- Effectiveness of Acupotomy Subcision and Nanofat Grafting in Depressed Scars Treatment.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2025Article
- Nano Fat Therapy and Platelet Rich Plasma Versus Nano Fat Therapy Alone on Burn Scar.Annals of burns and fire disasters · 2025Article
- AI-enhanced "Two-thirds Guidelines" for Lipolifting: Addressing Multiple Hallmarks of Facial Aging.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2024Article
- Effect of Injectable Acellular Adipose Matrix on Soft Tissue Reconstruction in a Murine Model.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2024Article
- Histological Comparison of Nanofat and Lipoconcentrate: Enhanced Effects of Lipoconcentrate on Adipogenesis and Angiogenesis.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2024Article
- Nanofat in Plastic Reconstructive, Regenerative, and Aesthetic Surgery: A Review of Advancements in Face-Focused Applications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
- Letter to the Editor: An Optimized Method for Adipose Stromal Vascular Fraction Isolation and its Application in Fat Grafting.Aesthetic plastic surgery · 2023Article
- Experimental study on stromal vascular fraction mediated inhibition of skin pigmentation in guinea pigs.Annals of translational medicine · 2022Article
- Research update of adipose tissue-based therapies in regenerative dermatology.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFat grafting has been extensively applied as natural filler and has been very promising in restoring volume loss. Lipografting has also been credited to reduce age-related skin changes due to the regenerative potential of adipose derived stem cells. Cell-mediated therapies in plastic surgery are rapidly evolving with growing applications. Nanofat, a bio-regenerative liquid suspension rich in stromal vascular fraction cells without viable adipocytes, has been described as an efficient cutaneous anti-aging therapy. We have published in 2013 a review entitled "stem cell facelift: between reality and fiction." Available clinical evidence at that time did not substantiate marketing and promotional claims of "stem cell facelift". The same year, the report about nanofat was published demonstrating striking clinical outcome. The current literature search is aimed at reviewing any evidence that has emerged since then regarding clinical efficacy of this modality.
methodsA thorough PICO tool-based comprehensive literature search of PubMed database for "the efficacy of nanofat cell-mediated anti-aging therapy" was conducted with a time frame from 2013 till present.
resultsDespite apparent increasing popularity of stem cell rejuvenation, well-controlled clinical studies about this modality are surprisingly very scarce. Only seven papers published after 2013 were identified and were included in this review
conclusionThough considered to be a safe procedure, and despite documented histologic improvement and striking clinical outcome in some reports, available evidence can hardly support clinical improvement of skin quality. Before cell-mediated aesthetic rejuvenation applications can be routinely undertaken, more robust evidence with well-defined primary outcome end points and objective outcome measures is required. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34085105What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.