ArticleJournal of magnetic resonance open2021
Reimagining magnetic resonance instrumentation using open maker tools and hardware as protocol.
Article in Journal of magnetic resonance open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Design and construction of a small embeddable nuclear magnetic resonance sensor utilizing 3D-printed components.HardwareX · 2025Article
- A complete 3D-printed tool kit for Solid-State NMR sample and rotor handling.Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997) · 2024Article
- Automated test apparatus for bench-testing the magnetic field homogeneity of NMR transceiver coils.Journal of magnetic resonance open · 2024Article
- 3D-Printable centrifugal devices for biomolecular solid state NMR rotors.Journal of magnetic resonance (San Diego, Calif. : 1997) · 2023Article
- One-Shot Resin 3D-Printed Stators for Low-Cost Fabrication of Magic-Angle Spinning NMR Probeheads.Analytical chemistry · 2023Article
- Review
- Cryogenic-compatible spherical rotors and stators for magic angle spinning dynamic nuclear polarization.Magnetic resonance (Gottingen, Germany) · 2023Article
- A 3D Printer in the Lab: Not Only a Toy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Over the course of its history, the field of nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy has been characterized by alternating periods of intensive instrumentation development and rapid expansion into new chemical application areas. NMR is now both a mainstay of routine analysis for laboratories at all levels of education and research. On the other hand, new instrumentation and methodological advances promise expanded functionality in the future. At the core of this success is a community fundamentally dedicated to sharing ideas and collaborative advancements, as exemplified by the extensive remixing and repurposing of pulse sequences. Recent progress in modularity, automation, and 3D printing have reignited the tinkering spirit and demonstrate great promise to mature into a maker space that will enable similarly facile sharing of new applications and broader access to magnetic resonance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.