Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34085036›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in big data2021

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Personalized Medicine With Software.

Adam Kapelner, Justin Bleich, Alina Levine, Zachary D Cohen, Robert J DeRubeis, Richard Berk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in big data, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Mental health care for older adults: recent advances and new directions in clinical practice and research.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Adam KapelnerDepartment of Mathematics, Queens College, CUNY, Queens, NY, United States.
Justin BleichDepartment of Statistics, The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Alina LevineDepartment of Mathematics, Queens College, CUNY, Queens, NY, United States.
Zachary D CohenDepartment of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Robert J DeRubeisDepartment of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Richard BerkDepartment of Statistics, The Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present methodological advances in understanding the effectiveness of personalized medicine models and supply easy-to-use open-source software. Personalized medicine involves the systematic use of individual patient characteristics to determine which treatment option is most likely to result in a better average outcome for the patient. Why is personalized medicine not done more in practice? One of many reasons is because practitioners do not have any easy way to holistically evaluate whether their personalization procedure does better than the standard of care, termed

Indexed as

bootstrapinferencepersonalized medicinerandomized comparative trialstatistical softwaretreatment regimes

Identifiers

PMID34085036
PMCPMC8167073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.