ArticleOSA continuum2020
Noise and bias in optical coherence tomography intensity signal decorrelation.
Article in OSA continuum, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Strip-Scanning for Efficient Widefield Retinal OCTA Mosaicking.Translational vision science & technology · 2026Article
- Review of dynamic optical coherence tomography for intracellular motility: signals, metrics, and their applications [Invited].Biomedical optics express · 2025Review
- Laser speckle particle sizer (SPARSE) informs the size distribution of tissue granularities.Science advances · 2025Article
- Accurate flow speed measurement through correlation ratios using a mode-selective photonic lantern in optical coherence tomography.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
- Optical Imaging of Cilia in the Head and Neck.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Optical, contact-free assessment of brain tissue stiffness and neurodegeneration.Biomedical optics express · 2025Article
- Full-field amplitude speckle decorrelation angiography.Biomedical optics express · 2024Article
- Compressed intracellular motility via non-uniform temporal sampling in dynamic optical coherence tomography.Journal of biomedical optics · 2024Article
- Speckle contrast reduction through the use of a modally-specific photonic lantern for optical coherence tomography.Biomedical optics express · 2023Article
- Phase-Decorrelation Optical Coherence Tomography Measurement of Cold-Induced Nuclear Cataract.Translational vision science & technology · 2023Article
- Deep Learning and Simulation for the Estimation of Red Blood Cell Flux With Optical Coherence Tomography.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Real-time co-localized OCT surveillance of laser therapy using motion corrected speckle decorrelation.Biomedical optics express · 2020Article
- Forward multiple scattering dominates speckle decorrelation in whole-blood flowmetry using optical coherence tomography.Biomedical optics express · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Functional optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging based on the decorrelation of the intensity signal has been used extensively in angiography and is finding use in flowmetry and therapy monitoring. In this work, we present a rigorous analysis of the autocorrelation function, introduce the concepts of contrast bias, statistical bias and variability, and identify the optimal definition of the second-order autocorrelation function (ACF)
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.