ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2021
The effectiveness of two evaluation techniques in the clinical education field: A step for promotion of bachelor nursing student's satisfaction.
Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of a smartphone-based online electronic logbook to evaluate the clinical skills of nurse anesthesia students in Iran: a randomized controlled study.Journal of educational evaluation for health professions · 2023Trial
- A virtual-based educational intervention for nurses about trauma patients triage: A mixed-method study protocol.Journal of education and health promotion · 2025Article
- The effect of "clinical virtual round" on clinical self-efficacy among midwifery students.Journal of education and health promotion · 2024Article
- The use of smartphone clinical skills recording in labor ward for midwifery students: New educational technology.Journal of education and health promotion · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPaying attention to students' opinions and suggestions on existing evaluation methods and new methods of evaluation is an essential and important part of clinical education, so this study aimed at determining the effectiveness of two evaluation techniques satisfaction among undergraduate nursing students. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis was a quasi-experimental study conducted on 60 undergraduate nursing students of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences in 2019. There were 30 samples in each group (logbook and e-logbook) that were selected by convenience sampling method. the Android application (e-logbook) was used in the intervention group to evaluate the clinical skills of students. The User Satisfaction Questionnaire was conducted by undergraduate nursing students. Data were analyzed using SPSS software version 14 and descriptive statistical tests.
resultsThe results showed that the mean (standard deviation) overall score of satisfaction from both evaluation methods including logbook and e-logbook was 39.7 (9.4) and 47.7 (12.2), respectively. Also satisfaction score of the evaluation method was significantly different between the two groups (
conclusionAccording to the results of the present study, the use of new and active methods of evaluation, including the application of e-logbook, can be useful in evaluating nursing students and cause student satisfaction, so using the application is useful.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.