Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34084823›Full record

ArticleJournal of education and health promotion2021

Medical record documentation quality in the hospital accreditation.

Saiedeh Sharifi, Mansour Zahiri, Hosein Dargahi, Farzad Faraji-Khiavi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of education and health promotion, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Comparison of medical documentation between pharmacist-led anticoagulation clinics and physician-led anticoagulation clinics: A retrospective study.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Saiedeh SharifiDepartment of Health Services Management, School of Health, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
Mansour ZahiriDepartment of Health Services Management, School of Health, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.
Hosein DargahiDepartment of Management Sciences and Health Economics, School of Public Health, Health Information Management Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Farzad Faraji-KhiaviDepartment of Health Services Management, School of Health, Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences, Ahvaz, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMedical records constitute a legal and professional document regarding the activities of medical staff in hospitals. This study was conducted with the aim of identifying the factors that affect the quality of medical records by implementing the accreditation models in hospitals. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis was a qualitative study. The data were collected via 28 semi-structured interviews. The research population included administrators and supervisors of nursing, medical records and accreditation in educational hospitals in Ahvaz, southwest Iran. Content analysis method was used to analyze the data. Descriptive statistics were used to present demographic characteristics of interviewees.

resultsFacilitators and barriers to improve the quality of documentation were categorized into three levels: organizational, environmental, and personal, all achieved after the implementation of accreditation model in hospitals. Six facilitating factors were identified including organizational structure, organizational culture, management support, individual characteristics, and perceived benefits science and technology. The barriers included five factors including program structure, organizational structure, beliefs, justice, and individual characteristics.

conclusionsThe identification of factors affects the quality of medical record documentation and it seems that health managers and policymakers should take measures to improve the quality of medical recording documentation through strengthening the facilitators and overcoming the barriers in the program since the purpose of accreditation is to improve the quality in hospitals.

Indexed as

Accreditationdocumentationhospitalsmedical recordsquality

Identifiers

PMID34084823
PMCPMC8057196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.