ArticleCureus2021
Perceptions of Rehabilitation Managers on Implementation of the Home-Based Older Person Upstreaming Prevention (HOP-UP) Program: A Retrospective Qualitative Analysis.
Article in Cureus, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Barriers and Facilitators to the Adoption of Evidence-Based Interventions for Adults Within Occupational and Physical Therapy Practice Settings: A Systematic Review.Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2023Pooled it
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction The purpose of this study was to identify themes and concepts derived from responses of physical therapy clinical leaders related to implementing a prevention-focused, home-based older-adult program known as HOP-UP-PT (Home-Based Older Person Upstreaming Prevention Physical Therapy) into their clinical operations. Methods Following Institutional Review Board approval, a retrospective qualitative analysis of transcribed interviews obtained by six undergraduate students participating in the Oakland University Ideas to Business Program (I2B) was conducted. Students interviewed nine local physical therapy clinical managers throughout Michigan using 12 questions developed by content experts. Questions aimed to ascertain the perceived opportunities and barriers to implementing HOP-UP-PT into each respondent's practice setting, clinic demographics, and suggested price point of a prevention-focused continuing education. Interview data was analyzed using the constant comparative method to identify themes and concepts. Results Sixty-seven percent of respondents (n=6) reported practicing in an outpatient setting; 56% of respondents (n=5) indicated 50% or more of their clients were 65 years and older; and 67% of respondents (n=6) suggested a price point of $200-$500 for an eight-hour HOP-UP-PT training course. Three concepts (community involvement and partnership, administrative barriers to an innovative delivery model, and foundational physical therapy [PT] skills utilized in a novel approach) and eight themes (community altruism, referral source expansion, integrated community relationships, current payment methodology challenges, favorability of clinic setting and type, minimal additional training required, willingness to pay for certification training, and prevention-focused or upstream mindset) were identified. Conclusion Physical therapy clinical managers identified a willingness to expand current rehabilitation models and incorporate prevention-focused care delivery into the existing care delivery approach. However, barriers and opportunities must be addressed in advance of a program roll-out to achieve optimal outcomes and cost savings within the healthcare system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.