Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34084649›Full record

ReviewSurgical neurology international2021

Awake spine surgery: An eye-opening movement.

Brian Fiani, Taylor Reardon, Jacob Selvage, Alden Dahan, Mohamed H El-Farra, Philine Endres, Taha Taka, Yasmine Suliman, Alexander Rose

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Surgical neurology international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Brian FianiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Desert Regional Medical Center, Palm Springs, California, United States.
Taylor ReardonKentucky College of Osteopathic Medicine, University of Pikeville, Pikeville, Kentucky, United States.
Jacob SelvageKentucky College of Osteopathic Medicine, University of Pikeville, Pikeville, Kentucky, United States.
Alden DahanSchool of Medicine, University of California Riverside, Riverside, California, United States.
Mohamed H El-FarraSchool of Medicine, University of California Riverside, Riverside, California, United States.
Philine EndresSchool of Medicine, University of California Riverside, Riverside, California, United States.
Taha TakaSchool of Medicine, University of California Riverside, Riverside, California, United States.
Yasmine SulimanSchool of Medicine, University of California Riverside, Riverside, California, United States.
Alexander RoseSchool of Medicine, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAwake surgery is performed in multiple surgical specialties, but historically, awake surgery in the field of neurosurgery was limited to craniotomies. Over the past two decades, spinal surgeons have pushed for techniques that only require regional anesthesia as they may provide reduced financial burdens on patients, faster recovery times, and better outcomes. The list of awake spine surgeries that have been found in the literature include: laminectomies/discectomies, anterior cervical discectomy and fusions (ACDFs), lumbar fusions, and dorsal column (DC) stimulator placement.

methodsAn extensive review of the published literature was conducted through PubMed database with articles containing the search term "awake spine surgery." No date restrictions were used.

resultsThe search yielded 293 related articles. Cross-checking of articles was conducted to exclude of duplicate articles. The articles were screened for their full text and English language availability. We finalized those articles pertaining to the topic. Findings have shown that lumbar laminectomies performed with local anesthesia have shown shorter operating time, less postoperative nausea, lower incidence of urinary retention and spinal headache, and shorter hospital stays when compared to those performed under general anesthesia. Lumbar fusions with local anesthesia showed similar outcomes as patients reported better postoperative function and fewer side effects of general anesthesia. DC stimulator placement performed with local anesthesia is advantageous as it allows real time patient feedback for surgeons as they directly test affected nerves. However, spontaneous movement during the placement of DC stimulators is associated with higher failure rates when compared to general anesthesia (29.7% vs. 14.9%). Studies have shown that the use of local anesthesia during ACDFs has no significant differences when compared to general anesthesia, and patient's report better tolerated pain with general anesthesia.

conclusionThe use of awake spine surgery is beneficial for those who cannot undergo general anesthesia. However, it is limited to patients who can tolerate prone positioning with no central airway (i.e., normal BMI with a healthy airway), have no pre-existing mental health conditions (e.g., anxiety), and require a minimally invasive procedure with a short operating time. Future studies should focus on long-term efficacies of these procedures that provide further insight on the indications and limitations of awake spine surgery.

Indexed as

Conscious sedationEnhanced recovery after surgeryMinimally invasiveNeural feedbackNeuroanesthesia

Identifiers

PMID34084649
PMCPMC8168649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.