Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34084640›Full record

ArticleSurgical neurology international2021

3D-printed cranial models simulating operative field depth for microvascular training in neurosurgery.

Vadim Byvaltsev, Roman Polkin, Dmitry Bereznyak, Morgan B Giers, Phillip A Hernandez, Valery Shepelev, Marat Aliyev

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical neurology international, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Immersive Neurosurgical Anatomy Using Photogrammetry: Technical Note and Scoping Review.Journal of neurological surgery. Part B, Skull base · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Vadim ByvaltsevDepartment of Neurosurgery and Innovative Medicine, Irkutsk State Medical University, Irkutsk, Russia.
Roman PolkinDepartment of Neurosurgery and Innovative Medicine, Irkutsk State Medical University, Irkutsk, Russia.
Dmitry BereznyakDepartment of Neurosurgery and Innovative Medicine, Irkutsk State Medical University, Irkutsk, Russia.
Morgan B GiersSchool of Chemical, Biological, and Environmental Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, United States.
Phillip A HernandezSchool of Chemical, Biological, and Environmental Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon, United States.
Valery ShepelevDepartment of Neurosurgery and Innovative Medicine, Irkutsk State Medical University, Irkutsk, Russia.
Marat AliyevDepartment of Neurosurgery and Innovative Medicine, Irkutsk State Medical University, Irkutsk, Russia.
Irkutsk State Medical University · RUOregon State University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe skills required for neurosurgical operations using microsurgical techniques in a deep operating field are difficult to master in the operating room without risk to patients. Although there are many microsurgical training models, most do not use a skull model to simulate a deep field. To solve this problem, 3D models were created to provide increased training in the laboratory before the operating room, improving patient safety.

methodsA patient's head was scanned using computed tomography. The data were reconstructed and converted into a standard 3D printing file. The skull was printed with several openings to simulate common surgical approaches. These models were then used to create a deep operating field while practicing on a chicken thigh (femoral artery anastomosis) and on a rat (abdominal aortic anastomosis).

resultsThe advantages of practicing with the 3D printed models were clearly demonstrated by our trainees, including appropriate hand position on the skull, becoming comfortable with the depth of the anastomosis, and simulating proper skull angle and rigid fixation. One limitation is the absence of intracranial structures, which is being explored in future work.

conclusionThis neurosurgical model can improve microsurgery training by recapitulating the depth of a real operating field. Improved training can lead to increased accuracy and efficiency of surgical procedures, thereby minimizing the risk to patients.

Indexed as

3D printingCranial approachMicrosurgeryMicrovascular trainingNeurosurgerySkull model

Identifiers

PMID34084640
PMCPMC8168712
OpenAlexW3163578128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.