ArticleMelanoma management2021
Impact of rurality on melanoma diagnosis in Utah.
Article in Melanoma management, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Challenges and lessons learned in recruiting participants for school-based disease prevention programs during COVID-19.Contemporary clinical trials communications · 2024Article
- Preliminary effects of a rural skin cancer prevention intervention for youths.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2024Article
- Rural-Urban Differences in Sun Exposure and Protection Behaviors in the United States.Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology · 2024Article
- Rural-urban differences in meeting of physical activity recommendations by sun exposure and protection behaviors in the United States.Preventive medicine · 2024Article
- The influence of rurality on melanoma diagnosis in Indiana: A retrospective cohort study.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2024Article
- Mohs micrographic surgery for keratinocyte carcinomas: clinicopathological predictors of the number of stages.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo analyze trends in Utah melanoma diagnosis and study the impact of rurality. PATIENTS &
methodsState-wide melanoma incidence was calculated using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data (2005-2013). A subset of 5199 patients treated in an integrated healthcare system was further stratified for urban or rural residence.
resultsEarly-stage tumors accounted for most of the increase in melanoma incidence over time. Age-adjusted melanoma incidence rate was higher in rural counties (46.7 vs 39.4). Anatomic site and stage did not differ between rural and urban patients. Rural patients were more commonly diagnosed by a local primary care provider.
conclusionRurality had an impact on melanoma diagnosis in the specialty and location of the diagnosing provider.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.