ArticleDental research journal2021
Article in Dental research journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Comprehensive review of composition, properties, clinical applications, and future perspectives of calcium-enriched mixture (CEM) cement: a systematic analysis.Biomedical engineering online · 2024Pooled it
- Antibacterial activity of biodentine againstFrontiers in dental medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Antibacterial Activity and Mechanism of Action of Motuo Citron Essential Oil onFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- Assessment of sealing ability, antibacterial effect and marginal adaptation of bioactive materials in pulpotomized primary molars: an in-vitro study.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Article
- Antibacterial properties of bioengineered silver nanoparticles from Pastinaca sativa against Enterococcus faecalis biofilms in endodontic therapy.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Comparative antibacterial efficacy of MTA, amniotic membrane, and hyaluronic acid in pulp therapy for primary teeth.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Comparative evaluation of compressive strength and antimicrobial activity of mineral trioxide aggregate incorporated with gold nanoparticles: An experimentalJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025Article
- Antibacterial effects of bioactive restorative dental materials on Streptococcus mutans: An in vitro study using the direct contact test.The Saudi dental journal · 2025Article
- Biocompatibility and antimicrobial effect of demineralised dentin matrix hydrogel for dental pulp preservation.Odontology · 2025Article
- Bioceramics in Endodontics: Limitations and Future Innovations-A Review.Dentistry journal · 2025Review
- Antimicrobial properties of bimetallic-containing mesoporous bioglass againstJournal of dental sciences · 2025Article
- Article
- The Effect of Chitosan Incorporation on Physico-Mechanical and Biological Characteristics of a Calcium Silicate Filling Material.Dentistry journal · 2024Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study assessed the antimicrobial activity of Biodentine, mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA), and calcium-enriched mixture (CEM) cement against MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this
resultsBiodentine showed strong antimicrobial activity against all three microorganisms with an average inhibition zone of 9.10 mm. The inhibitory effect of Biodentine on
conclusionAll cements revealed antimicrobial properties against the tested microbial strains. Biodentine had stronger antimicrobial effects against
Indexed as
Identifiers
34084290PMC8122692What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.