ArticleDental research journal2021
Finite element analysis of the effect of framework materials at the bone-implant interface in the all-on-four implant system.
Article in Dental research journal, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.
- Biomechanical Effects of Horizontal, Vertical, and Combined Misfits in Full-Arch Implant-Supported Titanium Frameworks: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Stress distribution in titanium and zirconia implants with full-arch prostheses: a finite element analysis.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Biomechanical Behavior of Different Framework and Superstructure Material Combinations in Two-Implant-Supported Four-Unit Prostheses: A Dynamic Finite Element Analysis.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Biomechanical evaluation of cantilever length and arch form in the All-on-4 implant concept: a finite element analysis.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Influence of Framework Material on Stress, Fatigue, and Stability of "All-on-Four" System Components-Biomechanical Evaluation with Finite Element Analysis.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Article
- Effect of implant number, attachment type, and framework material on stress distribution in mandibular overdentures: a finite element analysis.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Effect of distal cantilever and anterior implant diameter on framework and cortical bone stress in a PEEK-based All-on-Four mandibular prosthesis.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026Article
- Three-dimensional finite element analysis of full-arch implant-supported dental restorations: complete vs. segmented frameworks.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Impact of framework material, cantilever design, and wing configuration on stress distribution in patient specific additively manufactured subperiosteal jaw implants: a 3D finite element analysis.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Effect of different cross sections of polyetheretherketone splinting bars in maxillary All-on-4BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Biomechanical effects of digitally constructed titanium, modified polyetheretherketone, and polyetherketoneketone subperiosteal implants on atrophied maxilla: a finite element analysis.BMC oral health · 2025Observational
- Mandibular biomechanics rehabilitated with different prosthetic restorations under normal and impact loading scenarios.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- Shock Absorption Capacity of High-Performance Polymers for Dental Implant-Supported Restorations: In Vitro Study.Dentistry journal · 2024Article
- Stress Distribution on Short Implants with Varying Crown Heights - AnJournal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2024Article
- A finite element analysis study on different angle correction designs for inclined implants in All-On-Four protocol.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- Stress distribution pattern in all-on-four maxillary restorations supported by porous tantalum and solid titanium implants using three-dimensional finite element analysis.European journal of translational myology · 2024Article
- Evaluation of stresses on mandible bone and prosthetic parts in fixed prosthesis by utilizing CFR-PEEK, PEKK and PEEK frameworks.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Biomechanical comparison of different framework materials in mandibular overdenture prosthesis supported with implants of different sizes: a finite element analysis.BMC oral health · 2023Article
- Article
- Mandibular Reconstruction after Resection of Ameloblastoma by Custom-Made CAD/CAM Mandibular Titanium Prosthesis: Two Case Reports, Finite Element Analysis and Discussion of the Technique.Dentistry journal · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe "All-on-four" concept for treatment of edentulous arches incorporates four implants that are placed in between mental foramina in the mandible. The prosthetic framework is an important parameter in stress/strain concentration at the implants, prosthesis, and the underlying bone. Materials such as titanium, zirconia, and carbon fibers have been used for fabrication of framework in the past. The aim of this study was to analyze the effect of framework materials in the "All-on-four" implant system. MATERIALS AND
methodsFinite element three-dimensional (3D) model of edentulous mandible was simulated using a computerized tomographic scan data of an edentulous patient. Threaded implants were replicated along with the abutments using 3D modeling software and the framework was designed and simulated using material properties of titanium, zirconia, and polyetheretherketone (PEEK). Axial and nonaxial load of 200 N was applied at the abutment region of right distal implants. The computer-generated numerical values were tabulated and analysed by ANSYS software.
resultsPrincipal strain, von Mises stress and micromotion were assessed in the peri-implant bone region to evaluate its stress condition. Zirconia framework showed the least stress/strain values at axial and oblique loading. Maximum strain values were seen at the PEEK framework material. Zirconia framework in all models showed the least micromotion/displacement.
conclusionThe stress distribution pattern at implant-bone interface was influenced by the framework material used. The framework material, loading site, and direction of forces influenced the stresses and displacement at the bone-implant interface.
Indexed as
Identifiers
34084288PMC8122683W3129787667What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.