Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34084211›Full record

ReviewLung cancer management2021

Current clinical trials and patent update on lung cancer: a retrospective review.

Harshul Batra, Shrikant Pawar, Dherya Bahl

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Lung cancer management, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Harshul BatraNeuroscience Institute & Center for Behavioral Neuroscience, Georgia State University, 789 Petit Science Center, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA.
Shrikant PawarDepartment of Genetics, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06510, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6157-2462
Dherya BahlDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences & Experimental Therapeutics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several clinical trials using different interventions are currently being sponsored to combat lung cancer at its different stages. The purpose of this study was to provide a portfolio of those trials. All active, open and recruiting clinical trials registered at ClinicalTrials.gov up to March 2018 were included. Information related to 6092 registered lung cancer trials was downloaded. Phase II trials were in the majority, comprising nearly 48.7% of total clinical trials with industry the major sponsor (41.3%) followed by NIH (12.3%). Multicenter studies were the norm accounting for 47.9% and the main study location was the USA (50.9%). Common interventions were radiation (26%), surgery (22%) and EGFR inhibitors (17%). Patent information includes major patent filing office and sponsors. The data analysis provides a comprehensive description of lung cancer trials.

Indexed as

chemotherapyclinical trialsclinicaltrials.govlung cancerlung cancer patents

Identifiers

PMID34084211
PMCPMC8162165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.