ArticleVeterinary world2021
Serological and molecular survey of
Article in Veterinary world, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review ofOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2026Article
- Genetic Diversity ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Wild Boar (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
- Seroprevalence of 16Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Prevalence ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Foodborne Pathogens Across Different Food Matrices in Sicily (Southern Italy).Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Molecular Detection of Viral and Bacterial Pathogens in Red Foxes (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Leptospirosis in horses: Sentinels for a neglected zoonosis? A systematic review.Veterinary world · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimLeptospirosis is a zoonotic disease. Information on the recent prevalence of MATERIALS AND
methodsSerological analyses were performed using microscopic agglutination tests and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays were used to demonstrate
resultsAccording to the species, the positive sera were obtained from 18% of 358 boars and 6 % of 64 foxes tested. The prevalence rate is significantly higher (p≤0.02) in boars than in foxes. In wild boar, Australis represents the most recorded serogroup (15.9%), followed by Sejroe (2.8%) and icterohaemorhagiae (2.8%). In red fox, icterohaemorhagiae represents the most recorded serogroup (6.25%), followed by Sejroe (1.57%) and Hebdomadis (1.57%). PCR-based detection of
conclusionThe results of this study confirmed the importance of wild boar in the epidemiology of leptospirosis among wildlife in Southeastern France. Due to their predatory behavior and their varied diet, mainly composed of small mammals, red foxes could be considered sentinel animals of environmental contamination with leptospires.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.