ArticleJournal of conservative dentistry : JCD
Comparative evaluation of canal transportation, centering ability, and dentin removal between ProTaper Gold, One Curve, and Profit S3: An
Article in Journal of conservative dentistry : JCD. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cleaning ability of reciprocation and rotation motions in conjunction with either continuous or sequential chelation: An SEM study.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026Article
- AnJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2026Article
- Cone -beam computed tomographic (CBCT) analysis of root canal volume changes with OneShape, standard Mani -silk and BlueFlex acer file: AnBioinformation · 2026Article
- Quantitative analysis of troughing depth for successful instrument retrieval using the loop technique: A cross-sectionalJournal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2025Article
- Article
- Investigating Apically Extruded Debris During Pulpectomy with Two Rotary Systems and Hand Files.Journal of pharmacy & bioallied sciences · 2024Article
- Comparative evaluation of remaining dentin thickness using single file, two file, and multiple rotary file system - An in vitro CBCT study.Journal of conservative dentistry and endodontics · 2024Article
- Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of shaping ability of kedo-S square and fanta AF™ baby rotary files compared to manual K-files in root canal preparation of primary anterior teeth.Clinical oral investigations · 2024Article
- Comparative evaluation of remaining dentin thickness, canal centering ability and apical deformity between ProFit S3 and Protaper gold - A nano CT study.The Saudi dental journal · 2024Article
- Effect of Various Irrigant Activation Methods and Its Penetration in the Apical Third of Root Canal-In Vitro Study.European journal of dentistry · 2023Article
- Evaluation of dentin thickness preservation and the efficiency of instrumentation between traditional and guided endodontic access in mandibular central incisors.Journal of oral biology and craniofacial researchArticle
- A Comparative Study of Four Rotary Endodontic File Systems: Assessing Canal Transportation and Centering Ability using Cone-beam Computed Tomography.Contemporary clinical dentistryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThe aim of the study was to compare the canal transportation, centering ability, and dentin removal of Profit S3 (PS3), One Curve (OC), and ProTaper Gold (PTG) systems using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). MATERIALS AND
methodsThirty extracted human single-rooted premolars were used in the present study. Preinstrumentation scanning of all the teeth in arch form was taken using CBCT. To increase standardization, crowns were removed and only teeth measuring 16 mm were included in the study. The samples were randomly divided into three groups, with ten samples in each group; Group I was instrumented with PS3, Group II was instrumented with OC, and Group III - PTG. Postinstrumentation scans were performed, and the two scans were compared to determine canal transportation, centering ability, and dentin removal at 3, 6, and 9 mm, from the apex. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: One-way-ANOVA and the independent
resultsThe mean canal centering ratio and canal apical transportation for PS3, OC and PTG show no statistical difference (
conclusionIt was evident that PS3, OC, and PTG had no statistically significant difference when analyzed based on canal transportation and canal centering ratio. However, there was a significant difference among the three groups comparing the removal of dentin. PS3 and OC rotary file showed less removal of dentin compared to PTG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.