Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34083695›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Diet and general cognitive ability in the UK Biobank dataset.

Piril Hepsomali, John A Groeger

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06690892 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Understanding the Cognitive and Brain Health Effects of Increasing Beef Consumption in Young Adults

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Nebraska LincolnRan2025 to 2026Enrolled240ConditionsDietary Intervention, Dietary Proteins, Dietary Assessment, Cognitive Ability, GeneralArmsReady-to-eat beef in frozen, 5-oz packages, Ready-to-eat beef in frozen, 1-oz packages
NCT07031076 nawithdrawnnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Investigating the Cognitive and Brain Health Benefits of Lean Pork Consumption

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Nebraska LincolnRan2025 to 2026Enrolled0ConditionsDietary Intervention, Dietary Proteins, Dietary Assessment, Older Adults (65 Years and Older)ArmsReady-to-eat lean pork in frozen, 5-oz packages
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Piril HepsomaliDepartment of Psychology, University of Roehampton, London, UK. P.Hepsomali@roehampton.ac.uk.
John A GroegerDepartment of Psychology, Nottingham Trent University, School of Social Sciences, Nottingham, UK.
Nottingham Trent University · GBUniversity of Roehampton · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_PC_17228Medical Research Council MC_QA137853
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accumulating evidence suggests that dietary interventions might have potential to be used as a strategy to protect against age-related cognitive decline and neurodegeneration, as there are associations between some nutrients, food groups, dietary patterns, and some domains of cognition. In this study, we aimed to conduct the largest investigation of diet and cognition to date, through systematically examining the UK Biobank (UKB) data to find out whether dietary quality and food groups play a role on general cognitive ability. This cross-sectional population-based study involved 48,749 participants. UKB data on food frequency questionnaire and cognitive function were used. Also, healthy diet, partial fibre intake, and milk intake scores were calculated. Adjusted models included age, sex, and BMI. We observed associations between better general cognitive ability and higher intakes of fish, and unprocessed red meat; and moderate intakes of fibre, and milk. Surprisingly, we found that diet quality, vegetable intake, high and low fibre and milk intake were inversely associated with general cognitive ability. Our results suggest that fish and unprocessed red meat and/or nutrients that are found in fish and unprocessed red meat might be beneficial for general cognitive ability. However, results should be interpreted in caution as the same food groups may affect other domains of cognition or mental health differently. These discrepancies in the current state of evidence invites further research to examine domain-specific effects of dietary patterns/food groups on a wide range of cognitive and affective outcomes with a special focus on potential covariates that may have an impact on diet and cognition relationship.

Indexed as

CognitionDietMental HealthBiological Specimen BanksCross-Sectional StudiesDiet, HealthyFeeding BehaviorFemaleHumansMalePublic Health SurveillanceUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID34083695
PMCPMC8175590
OpenAlexW3164433208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.