Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34083568›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2021

Responses to chemical cross-talk between the Mycobacterium ulcerans toxin, mycolactone, and Staphylococcus aureus.

Laxmi Dhungel, Lindsey Burcham, Joo Youn Park, Harshini Devi Sampathkumar, Albert Cudjoe, Keun Seok Seo, Heather Jordan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Gold Panning-Related Chronic Cutaneous Ulcers in Guinea, West Africa.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Linking theOne health (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2021
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Laxmi DhungelDepartment of Biological Sciences, Mississippi State University, P.O. Box GY, Starkville, MS, 39762, USA.
Lindsey BurchamDepartment of Biological Sciences, Mississippi State University, P.O. Box GY, Starkville, MS, 39762, USA.
Joo Youn ParkDepartment of Biological Sciences, Mississippi State University, P.O. Box GY, Starkville, MS, 39762, USA.
Harshini Devi SampathkumarDepartment of Biological Sciences, Mississippi State University, P.O. Box GY, Starkville, MS, 39762, USA.
Albert CudjoeGeorgia State University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Keun Seok SeoDepartment of Biological Sciences, Mississippi State University, P.O. Box GY, Starkville, MS, 39762, USA.
Heather JordanDepartment of Biological Sciences, Mississippi State University, P.O. Box GY, Starkville, MS, 39762, USA. jordan@biology.msstate.edu.
Mississippi State University · USGeorgia State University · US

Funding

Training and Mentoring Core P20GM103476 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN MISSISSIPPI · PI MICHAEL R GARRETT · 2012 to 2026
$60.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103476
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Buruli ulcer is a neglected tropical disease caused by the environmental pathogen, Mycobacterium ulcerans whose major virulence factor is mycolactone, a lipid cytotoxic molecule. Buruli ulcer has high morbidity, particularly in rural West Africa where the disease is endemic. Data have shown that infected lesions of Buruli ulcer patients can be colonized by quorum sensing bacteria such as Staphylococcus aureus, S. epidermidis, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, but without typical pathology associated with those pathogens' colonization. M. ulcerans pathogenesis may not only be an individual act but may also be dependent on synergistic or antagonistic mechanisms within a polymicrobial network. Furthermore, co-colonization by these pathogens may promote delayed wound healing, especially after the initiation of antibiotic therapy. Hence, it is important to understand the interaction of M. ulcerans with other bacteria encountered during skin infection. We added mycolactone to S. aureus and incubated for 3, 6 and 24 h. At each timepoint, S. aureus growth and hemolytic activity was measured, and RNA was isolated to measure virulence gene expression through qPCR and RNASeq analyses. Results showed that mycolactone reduced S. aureus hemolytic activity, suppressed hla promoter activity, and attenuated virulence genes, but did not affect S. aureus growth. RNASeq data showed mycolactone greatly impacted S. aureus metabolism. These data are relevant and significant as mycolactone and S. aureus sensing and response at the transcriptional, translational and regulation levels will provide insight into biological mechanisms of interspecific interactions that may play a role in regulation of responses such as effects between M. ulcerans, mycolactone, and S. aureus virulence that will be useful for treatment and prevention.

Indexed as

Microbial InteractionsGene Expression Regulation, BacterialHemolysisHumansMacrolidesMycobacterium Infections, NontuberculousMycobacterium ulceransPromoter Regions, GeneticStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus aureusMacrolidesmycolactone

Identifiers

PMID34083568
PMCPMC8175560
OpenAlexW3165374434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.