Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34083382›Full record

ArticleeNeuro

Identification of Multiple Noise Sources Improves Estimation of Neural Responses across Stimulus Conditions.

Alison I Weber, Eric Shea-Brown, Fred Rieke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eNeuro. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alison I WeberGraduate Program in Neuroscience, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195.
Eric Shea-BrownDepartment of Applied Mathematics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195.
Fred RiekeDepartment of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195 rieke@uw.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-1052-2609

Funding

Mechanisms controlling retinal responses to natural stimuliR01EY028542 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI FREDERICK M RIEKE · 2018 to 2026
$3.5M
Retinal interactions between rod and cone signalsR01EY028111 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI RIEKE, FREDERICK M · 2017 to 2021
$1.9M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY028111NEI NIH HHS R01 EY028542
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most models of neural responses are constructed to reproduce the average response to inputs but lack the flexibility to capture observed variability in responses. The origins and structure of this variability have significant implications for how information is encoded and processed in the nervous system, both by limiting information that can be conveyed and by determining processing strategies that are favorable for minimizing its negative effects. Here, we present a new modeling framework that incorporates multiple sources of noise to better capture observed features of neural response variability across stimulus conditions. We apply this model to retinal ganglion cells at two different ambient light levels and demonstrate that it captures the full distribution of responses. Further, the model reveals light level-dependent changes that could not be seen with previous models, showing both large changes in rectification of nonlinear circuit elements and systematic differences in the contributions of different noise sources under different conditions.

Indexed as

Retinal Ganglion Cells

Identifiers

PMID34083382
PMCPMC8260275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.