Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34083346›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Does living at moderate altitudes in Austria affect mortality rates of various causes? An ecological study.

Johannes Burtscher, Gregoire P Millet, Martin Burtscher

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Emerging Stroke Risk Factors: A Focus on Infectious and Environmental Determinants.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. A mito-centric view on muscle aging and function.Frontiers in public health · 2023
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Health Benefits of Residence at Moderate Altitude Do Not Reduce COVID-19 Mortality.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Johannes BurtscherInstitute of Sport Sciences, University of Lausanne Faculty of Biology and Medicine, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Gregoire P MilletInstitute of Sport Sciences, University of Lausanne Faculty of Biology and Medicine, Lausanne, Switzerland gregoire.millet@unil.ch.ORCID 0000-0001-8081-4423
Martin BurtscherDepartment of Sports Science, Medical Section, University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.ORCID 0000-0002-5232-3632

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe effects of altitude residence on ageing, longevity and mortality are poorly understood. While adaptations to chronic exposure to altitude may exert beneficial effects on cardiovascular risk factors and some types of cancer, an elevated risk to die from chronic respiratory diseases has been reported. Moreover, high-altitude residence may be correlated with increased depression and suicide rates. The present study tested the hypothesis that living at moderate altitudes (up to 2000 m) is associated with reduced mortality from all causes. SETTING AND

participantsWe used a dataset comprising all deaths (n=467 834) across 10 years of a country (Austria) characterised by varying levels of altitudes up to 2000 m.

main outcome measuresTotal number of deaths, age-standardised mortality rates (ASMRs) per 100 000 population, cause-specific ASMRs.

resultsASMRs for residents living in higher (>1000 m) versus lower (<251 m) altitude regions (with agriculture employment below 3%) were 485.8 versus 597.0 (rate ratio and 95% CI 0.81 (0.72 to 0.92); p<0.001) for men and 284.6 versus 365.5 (0.78; 0.66 to 0.91); p=0.002) for women. Higher levels of agriculture employment did not influence mortality rates. Diseases of the circulatory system and cancers were main contributors to lower mortality rates at higher altitude. Residence at higher altitude did not negatively affect mortality rates from any other diseases. We highlight gender effects and-beside environmental factors-also discuss socioeconomic factors that may be responsible for conflicting results with data from other populations.

conclusionsLiving at moderate altitude (1000-2000 m) elicits beneficial effects on all-cause mortality for both sexes, primarily due to lower ASMRs from circulatory diseases and cancer. The presented analysis on cause-specific ASMRs over a 10-year period among the entire population of an alpine country will contribute to a better understanding on the effects of altitude-related mortality.

Indexed as

AltitudeNeoplasmsAustriaCausalityFemaleHumansMaleRisk Factorsaltitude medicineepidemiologygeriatric medicine

Identifiers

PMID34083346
PMCPMC8183194

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.