Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34083325›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2021

Use of behavioural activation to manage pain: a scoping review protocol.

Sandra Walsh, Martin Jones, Richard John Gray, Marianne Gillam, Kate M Gunn, Trevor Barker, Tesfahun Eshetie, G Lorimer Moseley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sandra WalshDepartment of Rural Health, University of South Australian - Whyalla Campus, Whyalla Norrie, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9702-652X
Martin JonesDepartment of Rural Health, University of South Australia, Mt Barker, South Australia, Australia martin.jones@unisa.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0002-6463-3574
Richard John GraySchool of Nursing, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9694-4206
Marianne GillamDepartment of Rural Health, University of South Australia, Mt Barker, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0169-3964
Kate M GunnCancer Research Institute, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Trevor BarkerAllied Health & Human Performance, University of South Australia Division of Health Sciences, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Tesfahun EshetieDepartment of Rural Health, University of South Australia Division of Health Sciences, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
G Lorimer MoseleyAllied Health & Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionChronic pain is a distressing condition and often poorly treated and managed. Psychological therapies are considered first-line intervention for people with chronic pain. Common psychological therapies require extensive clinician training and specialist qualifications. One approach that does not need lengthy training nor specialist qualification, but has empirical support in other health domains, is behavioural activation (BA). BA seeks to increase engagement in behaviours that are valued by the person and progress through behaviours that can increase mood and develop skills that build satisfying routines. BA can help people to manage their condition through scheduling behaviours, promoting routine and mastery over their condition. The extent to which BA has been used to support people living with chronic pain is not clear. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This scoping review aims to identify published studies describing the application of BA to support people living with chronic pain. To map the evidence regarding BA and chronic pain, including the study type and the associated evidence, a scoping review was adopted. The search will be conducted in bibliographic databases, clinical trial registries and grey literature. No date limits will be applied to the search strategy. Screening of titles and abstracts, and full-text screening, will be independently undertaken by two investigators using Covidence software. Any disagreement between investigators will be resolved by a third investigator. Data from included publications will be extracted using a customised data extraction tool. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The scoping review is an analysis of existing data and therefore ethics approval is not required. The findings of this scoping review will further our understanding of how BA has been used to support people living with chronic pain and inform future training and education programmes in this area.

Indexed as

PainResearch DesignDatabases, BibliographicEducational StatusHumansScoping Reviews as Topicdepression & mood disordersmedical education & trainingpain management

Identifiers

PMID34083325
PMCPMC8183225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.