Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34083321›Full record

ArticleBJGP open2021

Implementing a weight-specific quality-of-life tool for young people in primary health care: a qualitative study.

Yemi Oluboyede, Sarah R Hill, Suzanne McDonald, Emily Henderson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BJGP open, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yemi OluboyedePopulation Health Science Institute, Baddiley-Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK yemi.oluboyede@ncl.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9891-8279
Sarah R HillPopulation Health Science Institute, Baddiley-Clark Building, Richardson Road, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Suzanne McDonaldCentre for Clinical Research, The University of Queensland, Royal Brisbane & Women's Hospital Campus, Herston, Queensland, Australia.
Emily HendersonChildren & Young People's Mental Health & Wellbeing, Social Work, Education & Community Wellbeing, Northumbria University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundObesity is thought to be one of the most serious global public health challenges of the 21st century. The primary care setting is important in terms of the diagnosis, education, and management of obesity in children and young people. This study explored the views of primary care clinicians on the implementation of a quality-of-life (QoL) tool to help young people and their families identify the impact of weight on QoL.

aimTo assess the acceptability and feasibility of implementing the Weight-specific Adolescent Instrument for Economic-evaluation (WAItE) QoL tool for young people aged 11-18 years in primary care. DESIGN &

settingQualitative study in Northern England, UK

methodOne-to-one, semi-structured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of primary healthcare clinicians working in practices located in areas of varying deprivation in Northern England, UK. Interview transcripts were coded and analysed using framework analysis in NVivo (version 10).

resultsParticipants (

conclusionThis study has developed a platform for further research around QoL in young people who are overweight and obese. A future feasibility study will focus on implementing the tool in a small number of primary healthcare practices.

Indexed as

attitudeconsultationinterviewpaediatric obesityprimary health carequality of life

Identifiers

PMID34083321
PMCPMC8450887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.