Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34083246›Full record

ArticleBMJ global health2021

Health systems factors impacting the integration of midwifery: an evidence-informed framework on strengthening midwifery associations.

Cristina Mattison, Kirsty Bourret, Emmanuelle Hebert, Sebalda Leshabari, Ambrocckha Kabeya, Patrick Achiga, Jamie Robinson, Elizabeth Darling

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ global health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Maximising contributions of midwives in Africa towards achieving MNH targets: Lessons learned.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Cristina MattisonObstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada mattisc@mcmaster.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-7210-0690
Kirsty BourretObstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Emmanuelle HebertUniversity of Quebec at Trois-Rivières, Trois-Rivieres, Quebec, Canada.
Sebalda LeshabariObstetrics and Gynaecology, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Ambrocckha KabeyaCongolese Society of Midwifery Practice, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo.
Patrick AchigaVice-secretary, South Sudan Nurses and Midwives Association, Juba, South Sudan.
Jamie RobinsonGlobal Programs Manager, Canadian Association of Midwives, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Elizabeth DarlingObstetrics and Gynecology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionMidwifery associations are organisations that represent midwives and the profession of midwifery. They support midwives to reduce maternal and newborn mortality and morbidity by promoting the overall integration of midwifery in health systems. Our objective was to generate a framework for evidence-informed midwifery association strengthening.

methodsA critical interpretive synthesis complemented by key informant interviews, focus groups, observations, and document review was used to inform the development of concepts and theory. Three electronic bibliographical databases (CINAHL, EMBASE and MEDLINE) were searched through to 2 September 2020. A coding structure was created to guide the synthesis across the five sources of evidence.

resultsA total of 1634 records were retrieved through electronic searches and 57 documents were included in the critical interpretive synthesis. Thirty-one (31) key informant interviews and five focus groups were completed including observations (255 pages) and audio recordings. Twenty-four (24) programme documents were reviewed. The resulting theoretical framework outlines the key factors by context, describes the system drivers that impact the sustainability of midwifery associations and identifies the key-enabling elements involved in designing programmes that strengthen midwifery associations.

conclusionMidwifery associations act as the web that holds the profession together and are key to the integration of the profession in health systems, supporting enabling environments and improving gender inequities. Our findings highlight that in order to strengthen midwifery (education, regulation and services), we have to lead with association strengthening. Building strong associations is the foundation necessary to create formal quality midwifery education systems and to support midwifery regulation and accreditation mechanisms.

Indexed as

MidwiferyFemaleGovernment ProgramsHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyhealth policies and all other topicshealth policyhealth systemsmaternal healthmidwifery

Identifiers

PMID34083246
PMCPMC8174493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.