Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34082698›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2021

Distinctive gene expression patterns and imprinting signatures revealed in reciprocal crosses between cattle sub-species.

Ruijie Liu, Rick Tearle, Wai Yee Low, Tong Chen, Dana Thomsen, Timothy P L Smith, Stefan Hiendleder, John L Williams

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Emerging opportunities for DNA methylation biomarkers in cattle improvement.The Journal of reproduction and development · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ruijie LiuDavies Research Centre, School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Rick TearleDavies Research Centre, School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Wai Yee LowDavies Research Centre, School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Tong ChenDavies Research Centre, School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Dana ThomsenDavies Research Centre, School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Timothy P L SmithUSMARC, USDA-ARS-US Meat Animal Research Center, Clay Center, NE, USA.
Stefan HiendlederDavies Research Centre, School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
John L WilliamsDavies Research Centre, School of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia. John.Williams01@Adelaide.edu.au.
University of Adelaide · AURoman L. Hruska U.S. Meat Animal Research Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere are two genetically distinct subspecies of cattle, Bos taurus taurus and Bos taurus indicus, which arose from independent domestication events. The two types of cattle show substantial phenotypic differences, some of which emerge during fetal development and are reflected in birth outcomes, including birth weight. We explored gene expression profiles in the placenta and four fetal tissues at mid-gestation from one taurine (Bos taurus taurus; Angus) and one indicine (Bos taurus indicus; Brahman) breed and their reciprocal crosses.

resultsIn total 120 samples were analysed from a pure taurine breed, an indicine breed and their reciprocal cross fetuses, which identified 6456 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between the two pure breeds in at least one fetal tissue of which 110 genes were differentially expressed in all five tissues examined. DEGs shared across tissues were enriched for pathways related to immune and stress response functions. Only the liver had a substantial number of DEGs when reciprocal crossed were compared among which 310 DEGs were found to be in common with DEGs identified between purebred livers; these DEGs were significantly enriched for metabolic process GO terms. Analysis of DEGs across purebred and crossbred tissues suggested an additive expression pattern for most genes, where both paternal and maternal alleles contributed to variation in gene expression levels. However, expression of 5% of DEGs in each tissue was consistent with parent of origin effects, with both paternal and maternal dominance effects identified.

conclusionsThese data identify candidate genes potentially driving the tissue-specific differences between these taurine and indicine breeds and provide a biological insight into parental genome effects underlying phenotypic differences in bovine fetal development.

Indexed as

DomesticationGenomic ImprintingAllelesAnimalsBreedingCattleCrosses, GeneticFemaleGene ExpressionPregnancyCattleFetal developmentTranscriptome

Identifiers

PMID34082698
PMCPMC8176687
OpenAlexW3115068315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.