Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34082100›Full record

ArticleActa biomaterialia2021

Gemcitabine-loaded microbubble system for ultrasound imaging and therapy.

Lauren J Delaney, John R Eisenbrey, David Brown, Jonathan R Brody, Masaya Jimbo, Brian E Oeffinger, Maria Stanczak, Flemming Forsberg, Ji-Bin Liu, Margaret A Wheatley

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta biomaterialia, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Application of Ultrasound Combined with Microbubbles for Cancer Therapy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lauren J DelaneySchool of Biomedical Engineering, Science, and Health Systems, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA; Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
John R EisenbreyDepartment of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
David BrownSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Science, and Health Systems, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Jonathan R BrodyDepartment of Surgery Jefferson Pancreas, Biliary, and Related Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
Masaya JimboDepartment of Surgery Jefferson Pancreas, Biliary, and Related Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA; Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
Brian E OeffingerSchool of Biomedical Engineering, Science, and Health Systems, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Maria StanczakDepartment of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
Flemming ForsbergDepartment of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
Ji-Bin LiuDepartment of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA 19107, USA.
Margaret A WheatleySchool of Biomedical Engineering, Science, and Health Systems, Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA. Electronic address: Maw25@drexel.edu.
Thomas Jefferson University · USDrexel University · US

Funding

X-Ray Crystallography and Macromolecular CharacterizationP30CA056036 · NCI · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI Andrew Chapman · 1995 to 2026
$94.8M
Training in Tissue Engineering and Regenerative MedicineT32AR052273 · NIAMS · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI SHAPIRO, IRVING M · 2006 to 2020
$3.3M
Comparative analysis between patient-derived models of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas and matched tumor specimensU01CA224012 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI BRODY, JONATHAN, COUSSENS, LISA M. · 2019 to 2023
$2.9M
Optimizing Ultrasound Enhanced Delivery of TherapeuticsR01CA199646 · NCI · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI FORSBERG, FLEMMING · 2016 to 2023
$2.9M
Clinically Translatable Ultrasound-Sensitive Microbubble Approaches for Overcoming Tumor HypoxiaR01EB026881 · NIBIB · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI EISENBREY, JOHN, WHEATLEY, MARGARET A. · 2018 to 2021
$2.5M
Targeting HuR to improve a synthetic lethal therapy for pancreatic cancerR01CA212600 · NCI · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI BRODY, JONATHAN · 2017 to 2021
$1.9M
Vevo 2100 ultrasound scannerS10OD010408 · OD · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI FORSBERG, FLEMMING · 2012 to 2012
$525k
Ultrasound-Triggered Prophylaxis as a Novel Paradigm for Preventing Spinal InfectionF32AR072491 · NIAMS · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI DELANEY, LAUREN JO · 2018 to 2021
$189k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA056036NCI NIH HHS R01 CA199646NCI NIH HHS R01 CA212600NCI NIH HHS U01 CA224012NIAMS NIH HHS F32 AR072491NIAMS NIH HHS T32 AR052273NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB026881NIH HHS S10 OD010408
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultrasound imaging presents many positive attributes, including safety, real-time imaging, universal accessibility, and cost. However, inherent difficulties in discrimination between soft tissues and tumors prompted development of stabilized microbubble contrast agents. This presents the opportunity to develop agents in which drug is entrapped in the microbubble shell. We describe preparation and characterization of theranostic poly(lactide) (PLA) and pegylated PLA (PEG-PLA) shelled microbubbles that entrap gemcitabine, a commonly used drug for pancreatic cancer (PDAC). Entrapping 6 wt% gemcitabine did not significantly affect drug activity, microbubble morphology, or ultrasound contrast activity compared with unmodified microbubbles. In vitro microbubble concentrations yielding ≥ 500nM entrapped gemcitabine were needed for complete cell death in MIA PaCa-2 PDAC drug sensitivity assays, compared with 62.5 nM free gemcitabine. In vivo administration of gemcitabine-loaded microbubbles to xenograft MIA PaCa-2 PDAC tumors in athymic mice was well tolerated and provided substantial tumoral image enhancement before and after destructive ultrasound pulses. However, no significant differences in tumor growth were observed among treatment groups, in keeping with the in vitro observation that much higher doses of gemcitabine are required to mirror free gemcitabine activity. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: The preliminary results shown here are encouraging and support further investigation into increased gemcitabine loading. Encapsulation of gemcitabine within polylactic acid (PLA) microbubbles does not damage its activity towards pancreatic cancer (pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, PDAC) cells. Excellent imaging and evidence of penetration into the highly desmoplastic PDAC tumors is demonstrated. Microbubble destruction was confirmed in vivo, showing that elevated mechanical index shatters the microbubbles for enhanced delivery. The potential to slow PDAC growth in vivo is shown, but higher gemcitabine concentrations are required. Current efforts are directed at increasing drug loading by inclusion of drug-carrying nanoparticles for effective in vivo treatment.

Indexed as

MicrobubblesPancreatic NeoplasmsAnimalsCell Line, TumorDeoxycytidineGemcitabineMiceUltrasonographyDeoxycytidineGemcitabineGemcitabinePancreatic adenocarcinomaPolymer microbubblesTargeted drug deliveryUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID34082100
PMCPMC9233940
OpenAlexW3165859189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.