Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34081910›Full record

ArticleStructure (London, England : 1993)2021

Binding of Ca

Andreas Haahr Larsen, Mark S P Sansom

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Structure (London, England : 1993), 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Missense mutations on SynGAP C2 domain impair membrane diffusion.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Alchemical Free Energy Calculations on Membrane-Associated Proteins.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2023
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Curved Lipid Membranes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Andreas Haahr LarsenDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QU, UK.
Mark S P SansomDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Oxford, South Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3QU, UK. Electronic address: mark.sansom@bioch.ox.ac.uk.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/R00126X/1Wellcome Trust 208361/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

C2 domains facilitate protein interactions with lipid bilayers in either a Ca

Indexed as

Molecular Dynamics SimulationBinding SitesCalciumHumansIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsLipid BilayersMolecular Docking SimulationPhosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-Trisphosphate 5-PhosphatasesPhosphatidylinositol 4,5-DiphosphateProtein BindingPTEN Phosphohydrolaserab3 GTP-Binding ProteinsUbiquitin-Protein LigasesCalciumINPPL1 protein, humanIntracellular Signaling Peptides and ProteinsLipid BilayersPhosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-Trisphosphate 5-PhosphatasesPhosphatidylinositol 4,5-DiphosphatePTEN PhosphohydrolasePTEN protein, humanrab3 GTP-Binding ProteinsRIMS2 protein, humanSMURF2 protein, humanUbiquitin-Protein LigasesWWC1 protein, humanC2 domaincoarse-grainedlipidMD simulationmembranePIP(2)

Identifiers

PMID34081910
PMCPMC8507603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.