ReviewElectrophoresis2021
Particle trapping in electrically driven insulator-based microfluidics: Dielectrophoresis and induced-charge electrokinetics.
Review in Electrophoresis, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantifying and Minimizing the Variance of Gradient Insulator-Based Dielectrophoresis.Micromachines · 2026Article
- Microfluidics for cell therapy and manufacturing in oncology and regenerative medicine.Lab on a chip · 2026Review
- Electrophoresis: An Effective Viability Assessment Method across Cell Domains.Analytical chemistry · 2026Article
- Comparing Different Light Models for Virtual Electrodes in Optoelectronic Tweezers.Electrophoresis · 2025Article
- Enhancing cell characterization with microfluidics and AI: a comprehensive review of mechanical, electrical, and hybrid techniques.Biotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2025Review
- Recent Advancements in Metal-Organic Framework-Based Microfluidic Chips for Biomedical Applications.Micromachines · 2025Review
- Development of a DC-Biased AC-Stimulated Microfluidic Device for the Electrokinetic Separation of Bacterial and Yeast Cells.Biosensors · 2024Article
- Assessment of the Nonlinear Electrophoretic Migration of Nanoparticles and Bacteriophages.Micromachines · 2024Article
- Switching Separation Migration Order by Switching Electrokinetic Regime in Electrokinetic Microsystems.Biosensors · 2024Article
- High-Throughput Continuous Free-Flow Dielectrophoretic Trapping of Micron-Scale Particles and Cells in Paper Using Localized Nonuniform Pore-Scale-Generated Paper-Based Electric Field Gradients.Analytical chemistry · 2024Article
- Assessing the Discriminatory Capabilities of iEK Devices under DC and DC-Biased AC Stimulation Potentials.Micromachines · 2023Article
- Nano/microfluidic device for high-throughput passive trapping of nanoparticles.Biomicrofluidics · 2023Article
- Numerical modeling reveals improved organelle separation for dielectrophoretic ratchet migration.Electrophoresis · 2023Article
- Protein Dielectrophoresis: A Tale of Two Clausius-Mossottis-Or Something Else?Micromachines · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Electrokinetically driven insulator-based microfluidic devices represent an attractive option to manipulate particle suspensions. These devices can filtrate, concentrate, separate, or characterize micro and nanoparticles of interest. Two decades ago, inspired by electrode-based dielectrophoresis, the concept of insulator-based dielectrophoresis (iDEP) was born. In these microfluidic devices, insulating structures (i.e., posts, membranes, obstacles, or constrictions) built within the channel are used to deform the spatial distribution of an externally generated electric field. As a result, particles suspended in solution experience dielectrophoresis (DEP). Since then, it has been assumed that DEP is responsible for particle trapping in these devices, regardless of the type of voltage being applied to generate the electric field-direct current (DC) or alternating current. Recent findings challenge this assumption by demonstrating particle trapping and even particle flow reversal in devices that prevent DEP from occurring (i.e., unobstructed long straight channels stimulated with a DC voltage and featuring a uniform electric field). The theory introduced to explain those unexpected observations was then applied to conventional "DC-iDEP" devices, demonstrating better prediction accuracy than that achieved with the conventional DEP-centered theory. This contribution summarizes contributions made during the last two decades, comparing both theories to explain particle trapping and highlighting challenges to address in the near future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.