Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34081723›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2021

Sleep, evening light exposure and perceived stress in healthy nulliparous women in the third trimester of pregnancy.

Randi Liset, Janne Grønli, Roger E Henriksen, Tone E G Henriksen, Roy M Nilsen, Ståle Pallesen

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Evening blue-light exposure, maternal glucose, and infant birthweight.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Randi LisetDepartment of Psychosocial Science, Faculty of Psychology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-1726-1595
Janne GrønliDepartment of Biological and Medical Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Roger E HenriksenFaculty of Health and Social Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway.
Tone E G HenriksenDivision of Mental Health Care, Valen Hospital, Fonna Local Health Authority, Valen, Norway.
Roy M NilsenFaculty of Health and Social Sciences, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Norway.
Ståle PallesenDepartment of Psychosocial Science, Faculty of Psychology, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-5831-0840
University of Bergen · NOWestern Norway University of Applied Sciences · NOVaal University of Technology · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSleep disturbances are common in pregnancy, and the prevalence increases during the third trimester. The aim of the present study was to assess sleep patterns, sleep behavior and prevalence of insomnia in pregnant women in the third trimester, by comparing them to a group of non-pregnant women. Further, how perceived stress and evening light exposure were linked to sleep characteristics among the pregnant women were examined.

methodsA total of 61 healthy nulliparous pregnant women in beginning of the third trimester (recruited from 2017 to 2019), and 69 non-pregnant women (recruited in 2018) were included. Sleep was monitored by actigraphy, sleep diaries and the Bergen Insomnia Scale. The stress scales used were the Relationship Satisfaction Scale, the Perceived Stress Scale and the Pre-Sleep Arousal Scale. Total white light exposure three hours prior to bedtime were also assessed.

resultsThe prevalence of insomnia among the pregnant women was 38%, with a mean score on the Bergen Insomnia Scale of 11.2 (SD = 7.5). The corresponding figures in the comparing group was 51% and 12.3 (SD = 7.7). The pregnant women reported lower sleep efficiency (mean difference 3.8; 95% CI = 0.3, 7.3), longer total sleep time derived from actigraphy (mean difference 59.0 minutes; 95% CI = 23.8, 94.2) and higher exposure to evening light (mean difference 0.7; 95% CI = 0.3, 1.2), compared to the non-pregnant group. The evening light exposure was inversely associated with total sleep time derived from actigraphy (B = -8.1; 95% CI = -14.7, -1.5), and an earlier midpoint of sleep (B = -10.3, 95% CI = -14.7, -5.9). Perceived stressors were unrelated to self-reported and actigraphy assessed sleep.

conclusionIn healthy pregnant participants sleep in the third trimester was preserved quite well. Even so, the data suggest that evening light exposure was related to shorter sleep duration among pregnant women.

Indexed as

ActigraphyAdultFemaleGravidityHumansLightParityPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPregnancy Trimester, ThirdSelf ReportSleepSleep Initiation and Maintenance DisordersStress, PsychologicalSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID34081723
PMCPMC8174691
OpenAlexW3165838643

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.