ArticlePloS one2021
Application of machine learning approaches to administrative claims data to predict clinical outcomes in medical and surgical patient populations.
Article in PloS one, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prediction of Complications and Prognostication in Perioperative Medicine: A Systematic Review and PROBAST Assessment of Machine Learning Tools.Anesthesiology · 2024Pooled it
- The Effectiveness of Machine Learning Algorithms in Predicting Healthcare Service Quality Metrics: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Optimising enteral feeding prevents postnatal growth faltering in preterm infants: a retrospective cohort study.BMJ nutrition, prevention & health · 2026Article
- Predicting Atrial Fibrillation Ablation Outcomes: Machine Learning Model Development and Validation Using a Large Administrative Claims Database.JMIR cardio · 2025Article
- Claims-Based Machine Learning Classifier of Modified Rankin Scale in Acute Ischemic Stroke.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025Article
- Predicting outcomes after hospitalisation for COPD exacerbation using machine learning.ERJ open research · 2025Article
- Prediction of the Risk of Adverse Clinical Outcomes with Machine Learning Techniques in Patients with Noncommunicable Diseases.Journal of medical systems · 2025Article
- Signals in the Cells: Multimodal and Contextualized Machine Learning Foundations for Therapeutics.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Enhancing the Understanding of Abdominal Trauma During the COVID-19 Pandemic Through Co-Occurrence Analysis and Machine Learning.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Applying Machine Learning Models Derived From Administrative Claims Data to Predict Medication Nonadherence in Patients Self-Administering Biologic Medications for Inflammatory Bowel Disease.Crohn's & colitis 360 · 2024Article
- Combining artificial neural networks and a marginal structural model to predict the progression from depression to Alzheimer's disease.Frontiers in dementia · 2024Article
- Article
- A cohort of patients in New York State with an alcohol use disorder and subsequent treatment information - A merging of two administrative data sources.Journal of biomedical informatics · 2023Article
- On the Horizon: Specific Applications of Automation and Artificial Intelligence in Anesthesiology.Current anesthesiology reports · 2023Article
- Machine learning to improve frequent emergency department use prediction: a retrospective cohort study.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Extending artificial intelligence research in the clinical domain: a theoretical perspective.Annals of operations research · 2022Article
- Application of Machine Learning Approaches to Predict Postnatal Growth Failure in Very Low Birth Weight Infants.Yonsei medical journal · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to develop and validate a claims-based, machine learning algorithm to predict clinical outcomes across both medical and surgical patient populations.
methodsThis retrospective, observational cohort study, used a random 5% sample of 770,777 fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries with an inpatient hospitalization between 2009-2011. The machine learning algorithms tested included: support vector machine, random forest, multilayer perceptron, extreme gradient boosted tree, and logistic regression. The extreme gradient boosted tree algorithm outperformed the alternatives and was the machine learning method used for the final risk model. Primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes were: rehospitalization, and any of 23 adverse clinical events occurring within 30 days of the index admission date.
resultsThe machine learning algorithm performance was evaluated by both the area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) and Brier Score. The risk model demonstrated high performance for prediction of: 30-day mortality (AUROC = 0.88; Brier Score = 0.06), and 17 of the 23 adverse events (AUROC range: 0.80-0.86; Brier Score range: 0.01-0.05). The risk model demonstrated moderate performance for prediction of: rehospitalization within 30 days (AUROC = 0.73; Brier Score: = 0.07) and six of the 23 adverse events (AUROC range: 0.74-0.79; Brier Score range: 0.01-0.02). The machine learning risk model performed comparably on a second, independent validation dataset, confirming that the risk model was not overfit. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: We have developed and validated a robust, claims-based, machine learning risk model that is applicable to both medical and surgical patient populations and demonstrates comparable predictive accuracy to existing risk models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.