ArticlePLoS computational biology2021
GCSENet: A GCN, CNN and SENet ensemble model for microRNA-disease association prediction.
Article in PLoS computational biology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- DHGCMDA: a dual-view heterogeneous graph contrastive learning framework for miRNA-disease association type prediction.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
- MMFSyn: A Multimodal Deep Learning Model for Predicting Anticancer Synergistic Drug Combination Effect.Biomolecules · 2024Article
- Global-local aware Heterogeneous Graph Contrastive Learning for multifaceted association prediction in miRNA-gene-disease networks.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Kernel Bayesian logistic tensor decomposition with automatic rank determination for predicting multiple types of miRNA-disease associations.PLoS computational biology · 2024Article
- MHCLMDA: multihypergraph contrastive learning for miRNA-disease association prediction.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2023Article
- Drug Repositioning Based on the Enhanced Message Passing and Hypergraph Convolutional Networks.Biomolecules · 2022Article
- A Predictive Model for Abnormal Bone Density in Male Underground Coal Mine Workers.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Predicting miRNA-disease associations based on graph attention network with multi-source information.BMC bioinformatics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recently, an increasing number of studies have demonstrated that miRNAs are involved in human diseases, indicating that miRNAs might be a potential pathogenic factor for various diseases. Therefore, figuring out the relationship between miRNAs and diseases plays a critical role in not only the development of new drugs, but also the formulation of individualized diagnosis and treatment. As the prediction of miRNA-disease association via biological experiments is expensive and time-consuming, computational methods have a positive effect on revealing the association. In this study, a novel prediction model integrating GCN, CNN and Squeeze-and-Excitation Networks (GCSENet) was constructed for the identification of miRNA-disease association. The model first captured features by GCN based on a heterogeneous graph including diseases, genes and miRNAs. Then, considering the different effects of genes on each type of miRNA and disease, as well as the different effects of the miRNA-gene and disease-gene relationships on miRNA-disease association, a feature weight was set and a combination of miRNA-gene and disease-gene associations was added as feature input for the convolution operation in CNN. Furthermore, the squeeze and excitation blocks of SENet were applied to determine the importance of each feature channel and enhance useful features by means of the attention mechanism, thus achieving a satisfactory prediction of miRNA-disease association. The proposed method was compared against other state-of-the-art methods. It achieved an AUROC score of 95.02% and an AUPR score of 95.55% in a 10-fold cross-validation, which led to the finding that the proposed method is superior to these popular methods on most of the performance evaluation indexes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.