Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34081630›Full record

ArticleJCI insight2021

Epitope-specific antibody responses differentiate COVID-19 outcomes and variants of concern.

Courtney Voss, Sally Esmail, Xuguang Liu, Michael J Knauer, Suzanne Ackloo, Tomonori Kaneko, Lori Lowes, Peter Stogios, Almagul Seitova, Ashley Hutchinson and 16 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JCI insight, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. COVID-19 pandemic: the delta variant, T-cell responses, and the efficacy of developing vaccines.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Courtney VossDepartment of Biochemistry and.
Sally EsmailDepartment of Biochemistry and.
Xuguang LiuDepartment of Biochemistry and.
Michael J KnauerDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Suzanne AcklooStructural Genomics Consortium and.
Tomonori KanekoDepartment of Biochemistry and.
Lori LowesDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Peter StogiosDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Almagul SeitovaStructural Genomics Consortium and.
Ashley HutchinsonStructural Genomics Consortium and.
Farhad YusifovStructural Genomics Consortium and.
Tatiana SkarinaDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Elena EvdokimovaDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Peter LoppnauDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Pegah GhiabiDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Taraneh HaijanDepartment of Chemical Engineering and Applied Chemistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Shanshan ZhongDepartment of Biochemistry and.
Husam AbdohDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Benjamin D HedleyDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Vipin BhayanaDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Claudio M MartinDepartment of Medicine, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Marat SlessarevDepartment of Medicine, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Benjamin Chin-YeeDivison of Hematology and.
Douglas D FraserDepartment of Medicine, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Ian Chin-YeeDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada.
Shawn Sc LiDepartment of Biochemistry and.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUNDThe role of humoral immunity in COVID-19 is not fully understood, owing, in large part, to the complexity of antibodies produced in response to the SARS-CoV-2 infection. There is a pressing need for serology tests to assess patient-specific antibody response and predict clinical outcome.METHODSUsing SARS-CoV-2 proteome and peptide microarrays, we screened 146 COVID-19 patients' plasma samples to identify antigens and epitopes. This enabled us to develop a master epitope array and an epitope-specific agglutination assay to gauge antibody responses systematically and with high resolution.RESULTSWe identified linear epitopes from the spike (S) and nucleocapsid (N) proteins and showed that the epitopes enabled higher resolution antibody profiling than the S or N protein antigen. Specifically, we found that antibody responses to the S-811-825, S-881-895, and N-156-170 epitopes negatively or positively correlated with clinical severity or patient survival. Moreover, we found that the P681H and S235F mutations associated with the coronavirus variant of concern B.1.1.7 altered the specificity of the corresponding epitopes.CONCLUSIONEpitope-resolved antibody testing not only affords a high-resolution alternative to conventional immunoassays to delineate the complex humoral immunity to SARS-CoV-2 and differentiate between neutralizing and non-neutralizing antibodies, but it also may potentially be used to predict clinical outcome. The epitope peptides can be readily modified to detect antibodies against variants of concern in both the peptide array and latex agglutination formats.FUNDINGOntario Research Fund (ORF) COVID-19 Rapid Research Fund, Toronto COVID-19 Action Fund, Western University, Lawson Health Research Institute, London Health Sciences Foundation, and Academic Medical Organization of Southwestern Ontario (AMOSO) Innovation Fund.

Indexed as

Agglutination TestsAmino Acid SequenceAntibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralAntibody FormationAntibody SpecificityCOVID-19COVID-19 Serological TestingEpitopesEpitopes, B-LymphocyteHumansImmunity, HumoralMicroarray AnalysisNucleocapsidPeptidesSARS-CoV-2Antibodies, NeutralizingAntibodies, ViralEpitopesEpitopes, B-LymphocytePeptidesSpike Glycoprotein, CoronavirusCOVID-19ImmunoglobulinsInfectious disease

Identifiers

PMID34081630
PMCPMC8410046

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.