Evidence map›Paper›PMID 34081370›Full record

ArticleJournal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society2022

Passing return-to-sport criteria and landing biomechanics in young athletes following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Justin M Losciale, Matthew P Ithurburn, Mark V Paterno, Laura C Schmitt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Beyond peak torque: Longitudinal analysis of angle-specific isokinetic knee torques in collegiate athletes post-ACLR.Physical therapy in sport : official journal of the Association of Chartered Physiotherapists in Sports Medicine · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Justin M LoscialeDepartment of Physical Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5135-1191
Matthew P IthurburnDepartment of Physical Therapy and Center for Exercise Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
Mark V PaternoDivision of Sports Medicine and Division of Occupational Therapy and Physical Therapy, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Laura C SchmittSports Medicine Research Institute, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3813-6395

Funding

ACL Reconstruction in the Female Athlete: Strength, Knee Mechanics and OutcomeF32AR055844 · NIAMS · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI SCHMITT, LAURA C · 2008 to 2010
$148k
NIAMS NIH HHS F32 AR055844
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We sought to evaluate the sagittal plane knee joint loading patterns during a double-leg landing task among young athletes who passed or failed return-to-sport (RTS) criteria following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction reconstruction (ACLR), and in uninjured athletes. Participants completed quadriceps strength testing, a hop test battery, and the International Knee Documentation Committee subjective form following medical RTS clearance. ACLR participants "passed" RTS criteria (RTS-PASS) if they met ≥90 limb symmetry (%) or score on all measures and were categorized as "failing" (RTS-FAIL) if not. All participants completed three-dimensional motion analysis testing. Sagittal plane kinematic and kinetic variables were calculated during a double-leg drop vertical jump task. Mean limb values and limb symmetry indices (LSI; %) were calculated and compared using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) (for LSI) and mixed between-within ANOVA (for group × limb differences). A total of 205 participants were included, with 39 in the RTS-PASS group, 109 in the RTS-FAIL group, and 57 control groups (CTRLs). The RTS-FAIL group demonstrated lower symmetry values for peak vertical ground reaction force, peak internal knee extension moment, and peak knee flexion angle. Group × limb interactions were observed for peak vertical ground reaction force and peak internal knee extension moment. Involved limb values were reduced in the RTS-PASS and RTS-FAIL groups compared to CTRLs, while the RTS-PASS groups had lower uninvolved limb values compared to the RTS-FAIL and CTRLs. Clinical Significance: Young athletes who pass RTS criteria after ACLR land symmetrically during a double-leg task, but symmetry was achieved by reducing loading on both limbs.

Indexed as

Anterior Cruciate Ligament InjuriesAnterior Cruciate Ligament ReconstructionAthletesBiomechanical PhenomenaHumansKnee JointMuscle StrengthReturn to SportACL reconstructionbiomechanicsjoint loadingkinematicskineticsreturn-to-sport criteria

Identifiers

PMID34081370
PMCPMC9272897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.